CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] How blatant can you get?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] How blatant can you get?
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:33:48 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Steve hit this one on the head.  What assurances do we have that 
anything will be done?  None at all.  What does the reporting party 
gain?  Nothing.  What does he have to lose if nothing is done?  His 
repuation.

Sorry to say that the world is filled with folks pushing the envelope in 
all aspects of life whether it is speeding, welfare systems and even in 
non competitive horse events.  We actually witnesses people injecting 
their horse with something.  The rider said out loud that the horse 
needed adrenaline.  This horse is one of the hottest horse to start with 
and refuses to enter the arena and must be led in.  There are no 
monetary prizes in this rodeo other than end of the year trophies and 
ribbons.

Obviously some people and families are driven to win at any and all costs.

Dear CQ please tell us what if anything was done with the 4500 watt 
youtube incident.  If you want us to help you we need to know that you 
will take the report seriously and have the guts to actually do what is 
right.  Where is the transparency in the process?  Once again there in 
none unless you are in the know.

When the Organizers show that they are very serious in stopping cheating 
then maybe the other players will step up.  You do your part and we will 
do ours.

Mike W0MU

J6/W0MU November 21 - December 1 2011 CQ WW DX CW
W0MU-1 CC Cluster w0mu.net


On 10/14/2011 7:09 AM, Steve London wrote:
> On 10/13/2011 10:06 PM, Ken Widelitz wrote:
>> The ONLY way to prove illegal power is to be in the shack, or be in the near
>> field of the station with a measuring device. If this is done by a member of
>> the CQWW committee nothing more need be done. There is a witness with
>> credibility.
>>
>> If a non-committee member had a camera and was in the shack or near field of
>> the station and could document the violation, would that be enough for the
>> committee to issue a red card?
> Even that isn't enough. When EF8M posted a YouTube of their operation a few
> years ago, there were several "accidental" shots of their WaveNode wattmeters 
> in
> action. One shot showed power being split into two antennas, with 4500+ watts
> going into each antenna. That YouTube was up for a few days before it was 
> removed.
>
> Impact on EF8M ? None.
>
> 73,
> Steve, N2IC
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>