CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Flashback - Is It Time?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Flashback - Is It Time?
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 10:49:00 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I bet that 90 percent or more of the participants are not subscribers to this list.

Mike W0MU

On 4/3/2013 8:38 AM, Edward Sawyer wrote:
I can support this effort.  Doesn't burden the sponsors yet and we see who
actually bellies up.  I certainly hope that ALL of the vocal  people on this
reflector operated the CQ WW/ARRL DX both modes to show their dedication and
commitment to operating and competing as much as rendering opinion.

I think that 30 min off times and 6 stages is too generous.  Are we
competing or just accommodating convenience?  Need to decide which it is.

I think that N4OGW's suggestion of "the best 24" as long as you operate at
least 24 will be very demoralizing for this group.  The best 24 f the 40+
crowd is likely as good or better than the best 24 for the 24 crowd.  If you
think any of us are sleeping or eating during that 24.you really are not
paying attention.

Ed  N1UR

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>