CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Towards a critical examination of the 2-point rule in C

To: "CQ-Contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Towards a critical examination of the 2-point rule in CQWW
From: Mark <markzl3ab@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 10:28:54 +1300
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
> P.S. Up here in the barren lands of the EU Aurora Belt, we should get 4
> points for all DX QSOs that we manage to squeeze through. I'm sure that
our
> fate-sharing friends in Alaska and Nunavut will agree :) But actually, the
> guys really getting screwed over are in Oceania, and they get hardly any
> consideration. In my opinion it's a testament to their dedication that
they
> bother participating at all. If anything, most of them should get at least
5
> points for all contacts...

Bermuda to New York 1200km = 2pts
Christchurch New Zealand to Sydney Australia 2200km = 1pt
Bermuda to Los Angeles 4900km = 2pts
Christchurch to Hawaii 7600km = 1pt.

and that is putting to one side the respective contesting populations in
those areas.

Its a good thing we focus on self improvement rather than on being
competitive <g>.

73
Mark ZL3AB
Member ZL3X The Quake Contesters

PS: Its alright I know hell will freeze over first before the scoring
system is ever changed; there are to many vested interests.

PPS: I also want to know where the bridge from Europe to North Africa is
:-)
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>