And factor in antenna height & gain. :) Maybe not.
John, N9NA
>From cell phone
Milt -- N5IA <n5ia@zia-connection.com> wrote:
>You want to make it better.
>
>Distance scoring RULES.
>
>A meaningful exchange, ie. Grid Square for base scoring.
>
>Also, the band difficulty should be weighted for scoring which would also
>encourage more activity on the lesser used 'edge' bands.
>
>Also, the power levels should be weighted a la SPDC such that all scores can
>have somewhat of a direct comparison. Awards would still be by category,
>but scoring could be directly compared by HP to LP to QRP.
>
>Mis dos centavos, de Milt, N5IA
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Martin , LU5DX
>Sent: Friday, November 29, 2013 4:24 AM
>To: CQ-Contest
>Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Scoring System needs revision?
>
>SNIP
>
>Even more. It would encourage for example EUs to be more active on 10 m
>during solar minimun to make as many intra-continent Qs as possible.
>It would encourage SA stations also to make as many intra-continents Qs on
>160 and 80, bands that right now show a very little activity from this part
>of the world.
>
>SNIP
>
>Vy 73.
>
>MM LU5DX.
>
>
>
>-----
>No virus found in this message.
>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3629/6876 - Release Date: 11/28/13
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|