CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Excessive Bandwidth Rule was: Re: Suggestion for Cabril

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Excessive Bandwidth Rule was: Re: Suggestion for Cabrillo -- and the phone skimmer, new idea
From: brett graham <does.cq.censure.block.this.too@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 00:54:24 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Would everybody also not work somebody with a filthy signal if they were a
new mult, perhaps the only station heard from an entity?

Somebody around here replaced their older Big-Three-brand higher-voltage
bipolar amp (already capable of exceeding local power limit by 25%) with
something from Bravoland; previously 15-20 kc wide signal with bit of a
spike when keyed now sometimes approaches 70 kc wide when first keyed.

The Thai 200 watt amplifiers also stand out.

Will be interesting to see where in the results these filthy signals I
recorded end up.

-ex-VR2BG/p.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>