I was also thinking that it's a function of: you stick with what you know.
I forget how exactly I was introduced to the N1MM logging program. (I remember
how I was introduced to N1MM himself.) The price was right and the developers
didn't yell at me too much for abusing the program.
I'm under the impression that many of the current crop of elite contesters cut
their contesting teeth either when CT was the gold standard, or shortly
thereafter.
If it works, you use what you know. If it quits working, then you go try
something new (preferably something not too dissimilar from what you're used
to).
--
Michael Adams | N1EN | mda@n1en.org
-----Original Message-----
Hi,
different contests, different regions, different outcome. Here is what
participants in Worked All Germany Contest used 2013 (scroll to the
bottom):
http://www.darc.de/referate/dx/contest/wag/en/newsarchives/ - some strong
"local content" with i.e. UCX-log.
Only gut feeling: WT seems to be widely used by high scoring stations while
N1MM seems to be more evenly distributed from category winners, too, to more
casual operators.
Besides specific requirements for ports or networking I would support the view
of "a Pepsi/Coke"-argument and recommend anyone to check a variety of programs.
That allows to find the one feeling most reliable and comfortable even at 0430
local time...
Best 73, Chris DL8MBS
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|