CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques

To: <Ktfrog007@aol.com>, <w1rm@comcast.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques
From: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 23:09:49 -0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I just worked 9K9Z in the AA test to fill a band/mode slot.

Hope he doesn't get demoted, as he's the only station I worked in that contest.

dit dit

de HB



-----Original Message----- From: Ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest
Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2015 4:36 PM
To: w1rm@comcast.net ; cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques


I guess that depends how much time the sponsors  have to run them down.  In
addition to checking whether Unassisted types  are cheating.  And who has
bad signals and should be DQed.  Same for  power cheaters.  And ghost ops.
What have I left out?

After a while that could become a real 80 hour a  week job.

73,
Ken, AB1J



In a message dated 9/6/2015 15:10:03 GMT Standard Time, w1rm@comcast.net
writes:

I would  argue that just because the call is unique, doesn't automatically
mean it's  broken and warrants further investigation.


Pete,  W1RM


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>