CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Establishing a contest within a contest

To: n4zr@contesting.com, cq-contest@contesting.com, w1md@cfl.rr.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Establishing a contest within a contest
From: Alan Dewey via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 14:50:53 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Pete;
 
In my last report to the ARRL BOD as CAC Chairman in January 2015, the CAC  
did in fact make a recommendation that ARRL Contest logs be made public 
starting  with the ARRL DX Contest.  This report, which is public record, is 
located  at:
 
http://www.arrl.org/files/file/About%20ARRL/Committee%20Reports/2015/January
/Doc_26.pdf
 
My intent is NOT to re-open arguments for and against this issue on  this 
reflector but to just let you know that the CAC DOES recommend a  number of 
things that are never implemented by the PSC.  If you feel  strongly about 
this issue, let your ARRL Division Board Member as well as your  ARRL Division 
CAC rep know your feelings.
 
If you have any questions about the operation of the CAC in general,  
contact the new Chairman - George, K5KG.
 
73,
 
Al, K0AD
 
 
In a message dated 11/13/2015 1:04:19 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
n4zr@contesting.com writes:

How much  difference a decade makes!  Whenseveral of us suggested that we  
implement a CWAC to try out a 24-hour category within CQWW, Bob Cox  
angrily rejected the idea, saying that not a single QSO in a single CQWW  
log would ever be released.

How far we've come since! Now, if only  the ARRL would adopt the open 
logs concept, followed perhaps by the  Russians and Germans, we'd have an 
ample playing field for all sorts of  experiments.

73, Pete N4ZR
Download the new N1MM Logger+  at
<http://N1MM.hamdocs.com>. Check
out the Reverse Beacon Network  at
<http://reversebeacon.net>, now
spotting RTTY activity  worldwide.
For spots, please use your favorite
"retail" DX  cluster.

On 11/13/2015 2:45 AM, James Latham wrote:
> " I will  gently point out that nothing prevents you from doing that as a
>  Contest Within A Contest right now.  As long as the contacts are  valid
> under the CQ WW rules, you can score them any way you like and  publish
> the results according to any criteria you can imagine.   If enough people
> care about the results of the CWAC, it will become  popular.  If they
> don't, it won't.  The CQ WW will benefit  from the activity and you will
> benefit from having tried something  interesting and new.  Go for it!
>
> 73, Ward  N0AX"
>
> I think N0AX is spot on with his suggestion. Just set up  a contest 
within a
> contest and test your ideas out, if your new  contest works you will have 
a
> big start in establishing it as a free  standing contest.
>
> 73,  Jim   KP2XX
>  _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing  list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest  mailing  list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>