Another way of looking at their score is that despite having fewer ops and
transmitters they did better than the other M/M teams. It would be a problem
if they ran M/M and then claimed M/2.
Also, there is a huge assumption here that everyone who claims CR3L are being
unethical knows what the multiplier radio actually did. It is entirely possible
that the mult radio worked everybody and this is not knowledge that can be
gleaned from the 3830 post. Ditto for band changes.
Rudy N2WQ
Sent using a tiny keyboard. Please excuse brevity, typos, or inappropriate
autocorrect.
> On Dec 7, 2015, at 2:08 PM, Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> If you do a spot check on CR3L on the DX Summit you will see they were never
> spotted on more than two bands at a time during the whole contest weekend. If
> they were really Mult-Multi wouldn't you think they would've been spotted
> more? Plus they had only 7 operators, which is about what they've had in past
> years when running M2X.
>
> Now category switching isn't illegal in the rules but don't you think that
> integrity is on everyone's mind after what happened last year? Maybe it
> should be added to the rules just like having a bad or wide signal is.
>
> Bad call CR3L team . Maybe you should provide an explanation like the one we
> were all waiting for from UT5UGR last year. Maybe you had a good reason for
> doing this?
>
> Jeff
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|