PARTIAL SOLUTION: One smart ham ADOPT one other ham who wants to use LOTW
but finds it too difficult. The first ham sets the second ham up
completely !
Leave a cheat sheet in HIS language to use months from now.
Help a fellow ham and enjoy! 73, Charly
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Bob Kupps via CQ-Contest <
cq-contest@contesting.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Paper QSL cards are an anachronistic waste of time, money and trees IMO
> and I applaud the ARRL for LOTW.
> 73 and HNY bob HS0ZIA
>
> From: Bill Parry <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
> To: CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2016 6:50 AM
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] QSLing
>
> I just finished my QSLing duties for the months of December and November.
> I
> ended up with about 150 cards to the Outgoing Bureau. I have always QSLed
> 100% to cards I get via the bureau because I remembered how I I loved to
> get
> cards back when I was younger. It is a sort of a chore these days. I have
> thousands of QSLs and I don't need them anymore. I printed out the cards
> and
> look into the ARRL website and find that the Board of Directors has
> approved
> a substantial increase in cost. For years the bureau has been the QSLing
> route of choice of young folks and people without a lot of money, since the
> cost was very nominal. Now, when I calculated the cost of using the bureau
> it is $1.15 per ounce and a $7.00 service charge. In my case $23.10 for
> less than 150 QSLs. (This doesn't include the cost of the stamps to get the
> cards to the bureau.)
>
>
>
> I have been a life member of the ARRL since 1979 (and I might add a major
> supporter). When I paid the membership fee it was substantial for a young
> school teacher. Now I am finding that the ARRL is continually reducing the
> value of the Life Membership by continually adding charges for things that
> used to be free.
>
>
>
> I believe that the ARRL is so invested in LOTW that they are trying to
> force
> everyone to use it instead of paper QSLs. I love LOTW and use it for ALL my
> QSLs but a lot of DX still don't use it. Not sure what the solution is.
> Maybe I'll just start tossing the incoming bureau cards in the trash (no I
> won't do that). I am very disappointed in this decision by the Board of
> Directors. Another one of the "services" that are no longer services but
> are
> something you have to pay for. I am sure glad my cost of my prescriptions
> aren't set by the Board of Directors.
>
>
>
> Bill W5VX
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
--
Charly, HS0ZCW
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|