CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] QSLing

To: CQ-Contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] QSLing
From: Randall K Martin <rkmassoc@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 18:39:35 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On a different thread for the subject, I'm wondering if there is the possibility of setting up a "NO QSL" list, similar to the no-call list for phones (although the no-call list doesn't seem to work that well!)

I have always attempted to answer all bureau cards as quickly as possible. It isn't unusual for me to send out a thousand or more replies in a given year. In fact, I am in the middle of answering a new batch that just came in.

One thing I notice is that there seems to be a high number of DX ops that have chosen to simply QSL 100%, many using a third party company to print and forward the cards. If I receive a card that doesn't specifically state "Please QSL", then I don't do any more than place it in another big box which will eventually be disposed of by my XYL or son when I become an SK. Sometimes I will even place them in file 13.

Any ideas on how a registry could be created, where you could indicate that you do not want any qsl cards from anyone? The 100% QSLers could save some money by filtering their logs against the list, and then only sending cards for the remaining contacts.

I think I have enough JA QSL's to fill up a bathtub. I don't mind replying to people who truly need a QSL from Colorado, but I'd love to find a way to cut down on the time I spend handling QSL requests.

73 Randy K0EU

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>