CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] possible changes for CQ VHF Contest

To: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@sbelectronics.com>, "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] possible changes for CQ VHF Contest
From: Peter Sundberg <sm2cew@telia.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 15:20:42 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Good question Ed!

Many use Clublog as their source of information when making such quotes and I can assure you that the digi crowd are certainly uploading more contacts there than all of us who are on the bands daily to find old friends and new acquaintances to chat with.

And for some reason, maybe because of the very limited ability to transfer of info in FT8, they have to spot their QSOs on the cluster to say "Thanks, -7" (which is SSB quality). So in my view these are not real spots intended to highlight someones activity, instead it's a social interaction on the cluster network, that is not supposed to be a social media platform.

So we can't really use the cluster either as a source of data in this regard as there are so many other QSOs in other modes that are never spotted because it is considered unethical to do so.

I guess the experts are fully propagating the marketing created by someone who invented the mode and they are doing it for free. Actually, people now fully believe that they can not work stations on 6m unless they are using FT8.

As far as contesting is concerned, this in itself is a strong indicator that they must be in their own class.

73
Peter SM2CEW


At 09:59 2019-07-24, Edward Sawyer wrote:
"70% of ham traffic is now FT8."

I am curious where this datapoint is coming from?

Ed  N1UR
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>