Thank you Jim.
Well said. Exactly my feelings.
Before criticizing, please try to put in at least one serious effort. I
suspect those who complain will never compete seriously, no matter what.
73, Yuri VE3DZ
On 12/4/2020 1:51 PM, Jim Neiger wrote:
CQ WW is not a perfect contest. What in life is "perfect"? But its
fundamental format has proven the test of time, witness that it
arguably remains the favorite of most, world-wide.
Most of those who complain and don't like the rules, never, and would
not, put in major efforts ( which I define as operating at least 40 of
the 48 hours), even if the rules were 'more perfect'. There will
always be some excuse, no matter how favorable the rules, and
respective circumstances, may be.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Vy 73,
Jim Neiger N6TJ
On 12/4/2020 6:33 AM, Jorge Diez - CX6VM wrote:
CQWW is a callsign and zone numbers copying test, since 30% or more USA
stations are in a different zone that the callsign assigned
73,
Jorge
CX6VM/CW5W
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Libre
de virus. www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
El vie, 4 dic 2020 a las 11:31, <john@kk9a.com> escribió:
CQ already has a world wide contest with serial numbers in the
exchange.
John KK9A
N4ZR wrote:
They still need to do something about the CQWW
exchange. With zones, it's just a callsign-copying contest. I'm for
serial numbers.
73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|