How do you like those Trango units?
I was pretty impressed with the Trango & Waverider equipment at WISPCON2.
Are you only using them for backhaul units only?
Do ya have any APs out there with CPE?
Nate
-----Original Message-----
From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
[mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]On Behalf Of Bob Hrbek
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 10:06 PM
To: Karlnet Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Karlnet] RG ISP Base
Hmm, I've got an AP-1000 setup like this..
internet ~~~~trango~~~AP-1000~~~~~AP-1000~~~~Rg-1000 All routed but I see
33-40 ms pings. 14 customers
at another site I have
internet ~~~~trango~~~ap-1000~~~RG-1000cpe Bridged, I see 3 - 10 ms ping
times. 36 customers
I wonder how much your latency will drop.
-bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nate McLain" <nate@ctrail.net>
To: "Karlnet Mailing List" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:55 PM
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] RG ISP Base
> I usually get about 300-600Kbps.
> And my ping times from my house are around 14-22ms. But that is going
across
> my trusty Breezecom Pro.11 equipment to get there first... So Im not a
good
> candidate for latency since i have a extra hop or so. But we are going to
> replace it with the AP1000 pretty soon and then we will be able to see if
> the throughput increases or not.
>
> At times the throughput might go down to 200Kbps. But since we are selling
> 128Kb connections it isnt that big of a problem. The clients dont see any
> problem.. Just the guys that try to squeeze as much out of it as we can..
> ;-)
>
> Nate
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
> [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]On Behalf Of Bob Hrbek
> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:41 PM
> To: Karlnet Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Karlnet] RG ISP Base
>
>
> 20 users on an RG-1000 huh??? what is your throughput like? How about
> latency (pings)?
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nate McLain" <nate@ctrail.net>
> To: <mark@ekiva.net>; "Karlnet Mailing List" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:32 PM
> Subject: RE: [Karlnet] RG ISP Base
>
>
> > We have a RG-1000 that is running Turbocell v 3.88 and it doesn't have
the
> 8
> > user limitation that the newer versions have.
> > We have 20 users on this base station and it runs just fine.
> > So there is something in the software that is stopping us from adding
more
> > then 8 on the a RG. Otherwise we would probably upgrade our licenses.
But
> we
> > will just upgrade it with a AP-1000 instead.
> >
> > Nate
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
> > [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]On Behalf Of Mark Wauchope
> > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 7:38 PM
> > To: 'Karlnet Mailing List'
> > Subject: RE: [Karlnet] RG ISP Base
> >
> >
> > That has nothing to do with it. A 486 running that lean of an OS can
> > support more than 8 subscribers easily. KarlNet does not allow more
> > than 8 subscribers most likely so you will be required to get more
> > expensive hardware. They must have some deal with Proxim so users will
> > be forced to upgrade to the AP-1000 if they want to support more
> > subscribers. It is purely a marketing strategy.
> >
> > --
> > Mark Wauchope, Director of Engineering, Kivanet Inc
> > 776 East Second Avenue Suite 207 Durango, CO 81301
> > 970-749-2711 http://www.ekiva.net/ mark@ekiva.net
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
> > > [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] On Behalf Of Charles
> > > Chia Sheng Wu
> > > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 4:42 PM
> > > To: Karlnet Mailing List
> > > Subject: RE: [Karlnet] RG ISP Base
> > >
> > >
> > > the RG only has a x486 processor
> > >
> > > -Charles
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
> > > [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]On Behalf Of Andrew
> > > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 5:24 PM
> > > To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > Subject: [Karlnet] RG ISP Base
> > >
> > >
> > > Can anybody advise what the Client limit is on an RG1000 with
> > > ISP Base load.
> > >
> > > I assume it is 8 x subscribers, but want to know if that is a
> > > physical limitation at the MAC level or a performance
> > > recommendation that can be over subscribed.
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance
> > > Andrew
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Karlnet mailing list
> > > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Karlnet mailing list
> > > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
|