RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC...

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC...
From: CR <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: ka5s@earthlink.net
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 13:24:13 -0400
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
In general, these are between the buyers and vendors, and it is IMO a not-so-smart economy to leave them out. Considering the distance between buyers and vendors and the (in)ability of buyers to exercise remote supervision over process, though, it often turns out that rigorous incoming QC (also shirked as too costly) is all that is left.

So long as these are more expensive than any penalties that result, or than buying legislators and regulators (which happens) we will not see any change.

Cortland Richmond

On 3/30/2014 5:24 AM, Dale J. wrote:
Ed,

If the manufacturer is required to test the device then the overseeing agency 
should have the right to visit the mfg lab where the testing is performed and 
do an audit of the procedures, watch tests being performed and if procedures 
are followed.  Unscheduled visits are also to be permitted and spot checks in 
the field

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>