RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] QSL survey

To: "'Don W5FKX'" <w5fkx@cox.net>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] QSL survey
From: "Stephen M. Shearer" <wb3lgc@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:20:12 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
100% for awards - LOTW = yes.  Wish more DX would use.  MANY of my latest
QSL's are from QSO's more then 4-8 years old.  Please upload your contest
logs (I am sure you used a computer)...  NO card checking required for DXCC.
For LOTW - once uploaded the computer can crash and the QSO's are safe.  On
the other hand, paper logs are safe, too.   

1% eQSL = only when someone wants me to upload a QSO.

10% Buro = yes, not as much as I should - maybe because return rate on QSL's
is so low.  It costs less then direct to DX.  

1% Direct = very few.  Unless I get the SASE (I do for Delaware QSL).  Even
for rare DX it is a lot of work/cost and return rate is unsure.  


73, Steve WB3LGC and NR3I



_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>