Subject: | [SECC] SS UBN Report |
---|---|
From: | jpryor@arches.uga.edu (Jay Pryor) |
Date: | Mon, 08 May 2000 07:58:02 -0400 |
The fact is, I had 28 stations (3.2%) that busted some part of the exchange I sent. That's out of 903 raw QSOs/887 valid QSOs. Is the 3.2% error rate in the ballpark of what others in SECC experienced? It just seemed to me that 28 stations making errors was a lot. - Jay/K4OGG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/seccfaq.html Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [SECC] SS UBN Report, Lee Hiers |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [SECC] SS UBN Report, Bill Coleman AA4LR |
Previous by Thread: | [SECC] SS UBN Report, Joe L Blackwell |
Next by Thread: | [SECC] SS UBN Report, Gary Breed |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |