TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Radio Science + QSK = Radar

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Radio Science + QSK = Radar
From: "James Duffer" <dufferjames@hotmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 17:54:50 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
The Soviets were not the only ones using OTHR that utilized HF (some in ham 
bands).  GE did testing that encroached on the ham bands (at times).  I am 
saying that as I saw documentation that indicated this.  I have not 
personally heard any interference that I could positively say was OTHR in 
the last 15 years.

de wd4air


>From: "Carter, K8VT" <k8vt@ameritech.net>
>Reply-To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
>To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
>Subject: Re: [TenTec] Radio Science + QSK = Radar
>Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 14:05:38 -0500
>
>GARY HUBER wrote:
>
> >When the Soviets were running OTHR in the amateur bands, (which used the 
>HF echo to "see" targets) I used QSK CW dits to synchronize with their OTHR 
>pulse timing and jam their "B" scopes. As a former Radar Electronics 
>Counter-Measures and Electronics Counter-Counter-Measures operator, I knew 
>it was simply a matter of transmitting a signal of about the same 
>frequency, duration, and slightly stronger than their "return" to confuse 
>their operators.
> >
> >
>
>I guess we should all be thankful that they didn't confuse your Omni D
>for a swarm of U.S. ICBMs coming over the horizon...  ;-)
>
>_______________________________________________
>TenTec mailing list
>TenTec@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>