TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] General coverage RX/XCVR suggestions?

To: wb5jnc@gulseth.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] General coverage RX/XCVR suggestions?
From: Bwana Bob <wb2vuf@qsl.net>
Reply-to: wb2vuf@qsl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 21:25:11 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Al:

The Ten-Tec 1254 kit is a very nice receiver. The 4 kHz filter is a compromise, though, a little wide for SSB and a little narrow for AM. However, there are inexpensive filters on the market which you could add with a little relay or diode switch. Check out the Kiwa Electronics web site. They have several filters that would work.

For the best broadcast band and general shortwave reception, you nee a big old boatanchor, like anything from the Hammarlund HQ series.


                        73,

                        Bob WB2VUF

Al Gulseth wrote:

OK folks,

I need some input here. I'm looking for a reasonably priced general coverage rig (either receiver or transceiver). The intended uses would include both SW BC and ham band listening, with good CW performance a must. Also, the XYL is a KC Royals fan (with no local affiliates -- all the stations are "secondary coverage" situations), so good performance on the AM BC band would be a plus. I would also prefer "user-serviceable" solid state (i.e., no surface mount).

In looking at the possibilities, I have come up with the following list among the Ten-Tec offerings: a few other alternatives I am considering are listed at the end. Your comments/suggestions concerning my assessment of these is requested (list is in alphabetical order):

Argonaut V: positives: compact size, good performance based on reviews. Drawbacks: not easily user serviceable, stretches the budgeted range.

Delta II: positives: reasonably compact size, fits target price range, good performance from my contact with one some time back. Drawbacks: lack of availability?

Paragon: positives: excellent performer based on "hands-on" experience, good availability (several currently listed for sale in various places). Drawbacks: larger footprint, stretches the budgeted range.

RX-320: positives: excellent performer according to reviews, small footprint.
Drawbacks: not stand alone (requires control computer of some sort or 3rd party "front panel" at extra cost).

SP-325: positives: excellent performer, reasonably priced. Drawbacks: limited availability, possible service issues due to obsolete parts, large footprint.

T-kit 1254: positives: small footprint, well within budget range. Drawbacks: not as versatile in filtering etc.

Other possibilities outside the TT product line I am considering include the Drake SSR-1 or SW series and possibly some of the Ickesu (AKA Yaecomwood) offerings.

Any comments or suggestions?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>