TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] eHam Reviews

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] eHam Reviews
From: Bwana Bob <wb2vuf@qsl.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:05:58 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Don't discount the possibility that some e-ham posting may be hoaxes. 
Happy Halloween!


                                73,

                                Bob WB2VUF

Grant Youngman wrote:
> It appears that the original post regarding ON4UN's disposition of his
> Orions has been sent to the bit bucket, along with some others that were
> posted right after that in response.
> 
> But for the first time in a long time I bothered to read through the
> comments overall.  Interesting points of view.  One guy even thought his
> Swan 500 was a better radio.  Also his Signal One (didn't say WHICH one),
> was "1000 time [sic] better".  He didn't say what that "1000 time" factor
> referred to, but I do hope he's enjoying that Swan :-)
> 
> Sometimes you just have to shake your head ....
> 
> Grant/NQ5T
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>