TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Fan Disappointment....

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Fan Disappointment....
From: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Reply-to: Ron Castro <ronc@sonic.net>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:00:57 -0800
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
If the DX stations used CW Skimmer in a non-contest, split pile-up, all you would need to do is find a clear spot and your callsign would show up on the DX station's band map, even if you were 50 dB below stations on either side of you. He points...he clicks...he works you! I like it!

          Ron  N6IE
     www.N6IE.com


----- Original Message ----- From: <Rsoifer@aol.com>
To: <ronc@sonic.net>; <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Fan Disappointment....


Hi Ron,

Thanks for the info.  I'll bear it in mind.

In my experience as a CW DXer, the best approach is not to zero-beat the
last station worked, unless you have a rock-crushing signal (which I don't). Rather, what works for me is to analyze the DX op's pattern of replies, to figure out where he might be tuning next. As you said, the Orion/O II's sub receiver is good enough for that. CW Skimmer, while it might be nice to have,
isn't really necessary for that either.

Actually, if more and more ops use CW Skimmer to position themselves in
pile-ups, it will become self-defeating in the same way that DX clusters are today. As the old-time ball player said, the thing to do is to "hit 'em where
they ain't."

I "retired" from serious contesting 35 years ago, when I moved out of the
PVRC's contest circle.  It sure has changed since then!

73 Ray W2RS




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>