TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Worn out on the continual debates....

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Worn out on the continual debates....
From: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:55:27 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I will agree with this also.  I own three Ten Tecs at the moment.  I want to 
support them and get the best I can out of them.

I belong to other reflectors and go there to learn about their products.

Frankly, I could care less about K3 or Flex or XYZ products....at least in 
the context of THIS reflector.

73 de Gary, AA2IZ


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <d.e.warnick@comcast.net>
To: <kg6tt@arrl.net>; "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" 
<tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 6:17 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Worn out on the continual debates....


>
>
> Jerry,
>
> Well said. Thank you for stating what I believe is the frustration of the 
> 'silent majority' on this reflector with the vocal few.
>
>
>
> Dave
>
> WA3MKB
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jerry Volpe" <kg6tt@arrl.net>
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 3:56:48 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: [TenTec] Worn out on the continual debates....
>
> I come to the Ten-Tec Reflectors for information and discussions on how
> to get the best performance out of a particular Ten-Tec. I have no
> interest in learning what the Elecraft can do or not, etc... at least
> not on this reflector. I subscribe to the Elecraft Reflector too. That
> is where I go for information, discussions, etc... related to their
> equipment. I surely wish we could all come to a gentleman's agreement to
> not drag the comparisons on and on. Unfortunately I don't expect that
> level of cooperation. I already went to Digest form a few years back so
> I can quickly skim through the Ten-Tec bashing, Elecraft bashing,....
> whatever. My next stop is to give up altogether and simply
> unsubscribe.... not to that point yet, but getting there. I am not
> looking to cheer TT and carry on high the Ten-Tec banner..... just
> support those who currently own and use a Ten-Tec and gain some support
> myself..... the concept here is that we, current TT owners, can get the
> most out of their equipment investment. Getting a bit tired of the
> Sherwood evaluations too.... I have studied them closely and see none of
> the major transceiver being noticeably superior under actual day-to-day
> use. It is really a lot of subjective opinions as to what specs
> differentiate true differences in performance.
>
> Finally on the subject of those continually weighing in on the TT
> Reflector when they no longer have a TT Transceiver..... frankly, I
> don't get it. If you have an Icom why not 'reflect' on an Icom
> Reflector? If you have an Elecraft.... well you get my thought. My
> thinking is instead of boohooing what we don't have or seeking support
> for our own ego decisions ....why not spend time and energy on the
> reflector/group that supports what you are using? As an RF Engineer and
> a long time ham radio operator, my personal impression is that the
> ultimate differences in performance are so subjective at this level of
> transceiver development and manufacturing to pretty much invalidate
> specific claims of superiority. Seems like simple oneupmanship.... but
> this is my opinion.
>
> Why can't we simply agree to disagree on some points and bring the
> discussions back to supporting Ten-Tec users and Ten-Tec equipment?
> Lastly, it seems to me that there is little value in trying to second
> guess Ten-Tec product development strategy on a reflector. The TT
> support page says nothing about Orion development ceasing. Next week it
> might, but until they actually state that fact why not assume that once
> TT has added to their engineering team they will re-address firmware
> issues for the Orion and Orion II? Probably the best place for our
> firmware related inquires is TT Themselves.... so if you really want to
> know why not write them a letter? My letters get answered... your's
> would too I imagine.
>
> Meanwhile back to DXing with my Orion 565....!
>
> 73 Everyone,
>
> Jerry, KG6TT
>
> -- 
> Ralph Jerald "Jerry" Volpe
> Amateur Radio Operator KG6TT
> ARRL Member & VE
> FISTS 12304
>
> 788 Chestnut Drive
> Fairfield, CA 94533
>
> kg6tt@arrl.net
>
> 510 325-7724
> 707 399-8838 FAXtly
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>