> this discussion "does not apply to me". For those of us with a scope,
> great, use it. But, if you don't have a scope, simply ask a fellow ham
> to monitor your signal periodically.
Excellent advice, although anyone who can afford one of the popular
late-generation SWR meters can certainly afford a used dual-trace
oscilloscope. Quality scopes are plentiful on the used equipment market and
they don't need to have lab-grade accuracy in order to detect the presence
of hot-switching. I have identified several timing issues over the years
with a scope that would not have been identified by ear alone. By the time
the problem is identified by others, needless QRM has already resulted. At
the very least, a scope should be borrowed with any major equipment change
(e.g, the changing of a transceiver or amplifier) to ensure that system
timing is accurate after the system change.
For the past fifteen years, I've been using a monitoring system like that
used for the QST Product Reviews: The station RF sample is routed to scope
Channel A. Channel B is DC-coupled to a spare output from a microHam CW
keyer which applies a buffered + 5VDC on an auxiliary RCA connector. The
scope is then triggered by Channel B and the displayed waveform looks
identical to those that appear in the product reviews. Triggering the scope
from the keyer keeps the waveform stationary for measurement purposes
without having to chase the waveform as is common when external scope
triggering is ignored.
Paul, W9AC
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
|