Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: QSL or CFM or R?

To: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Subject: Re: Topband: QSL or CFM or R?
From: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 11:16:56 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Fine. But in marginal conditions a single R can easily get lost to a 
static burst or signal flutter/rapid QSB. I still contend that RRR 
is the same length as QSL or CFM and more likely to be understood if 
part of it happens to be missed.

Paul


On 12/13/2011 11:13 AM, Doug Renwick wrote:
> Hold on just a minute.  I am talking about a single QSL or single CFM not a
> long string of these.  I don't need a long string of RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRs.
> Besides the string or Rs wastes too much time.  And also I am talking about
> marginal copying conditions.  If the station is 60 over 9, then nothing
> needs to be said to confirm.
>
> Doug
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>