I agree with Roger. Both "QSL" and "CFM" are inefficient ways for
indicating solid copy on CW. A simple "R" is all that's needed.
73, Joe
K2XX
On 12/13/2011 10:19 AM, Roger D Johnson wrote:
> My pet peeve is the use of QSL. It's supposed to indicate the receipt of a
> message. A simple "roger" will suffice for the receipt of a signal report.
>
> 73, Roger (no ten impunded)
>
> On 12/12/2011 4:06 PM, Carl Clawson wrote:
>>> Another constant irking remarks extant is the use of "Roger"
>>> in place of
>>> "over" or "go ahead". To which I always remark..."my name is
>>> Herb, not
>>> Roger....... Roger?
>>
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
|