Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 45 Question

To: <TOWERTALK@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 45 Question
From: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 21:30:49 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
What is not registering is why you are claiming that adding a second bearing 
reduces rotator failure.  What is the theory?



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
To: <john@kk9a.com>; <TOWERTALK@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 45 Question



  If there is such a reduction in rotator failure using this method,
> why are you so concerned about making it easier to replace them.
>
> KK9A


Rotators have to be removed when the mast has to be dropped to replace,
repair or add antennas. I dont care for climbing the mast and I like
stability when I'm lowering and raising.

And I'll repeat myself if it didnt register the first time. Ive never had a
binding issue with dual bearings nor know of anyone first hand that has.

Carl
KM1H 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>