On 11/29/11 10:45 AM, Paul Christensen wrote:
> I just modeled a 10m four-square in 4Nec2. I used 60 #14 AWG radials
> 5/8-wave long over average soil, and 5/8 wave radiators. The F/B is
> terrible at 1/4-wave spacing.
how did you set the element currents? Explicitly with type 6 sources?
or with a matching network/transmission lines?
F/B being bad is generally the result of the phases/amplitudes being
wrong (small errors fill in the nulls)
At best, it's about 12dB at an elevation of
> 45 degrees. As would be expected with a 5/8wave vertical, two lobes are
> present. Maximum FS with this ground occurs at 15 degrees elevation with a
> secondary lobe at about 60 degrees elevation. The second lobe is within 3dB
> of the primary lobe. Reducing radial length to either 1/4 or 1/2 wave has
> minimal effect on pattern. There may be other combinations of spacing and
> source phase with 5/8 wave verticals that yield better pattern results.
>
> I'm not sure why anyone would want to use 5/8-wave verticals on HF. We
> tend to equate 5/8-wave with maximum 0-degree elevation gain (usually from
> VHF/UHF antenna literature). If someone has a compelling reason to use
> 5/8-wave *vertical* radiators on HF, I would like to hear about it.
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|