Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Tuning raised radial verticals

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Tuning raised radial verticals
From: Gary Johnson <gwj@wb9jps.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 09:25:19 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
You might like my article on a recent rebuild of the 80m wire 4sq at N6RO in 
the July/Aug 2017 issue of NCJ, or download it from: 
http://www.wb9jps.com/Gary_Johnson/Amateur_Radio_files/Four_Square_Rebuild_at_N6RO.pdf

Each antenna had a vertical element about 66 ft long and two radials about 58 
ft long, elevated at 10 ft, optimized for 3750 (SSB) and with a switched 
loading coil on the radial side for CW operation. Phasing lines were 1/4 wave 
at 3650. We have a Comtek system.

First comment: The commercial phasing boxes (Comtek and DXE) are optimized for 
exactly one antenna system, based on feedpoint impedance and mutual coupling: 
Full-sized tubular verticals, ground-mounted over a substantial radial field. 
As we deviate from that, the impedances change and the magnitude and phase at 
each element is no longer exactly as desired. The result is pattern 
degradation, mostly in the null off the back. But practically speaking, it’s 
not a disaster and we all get reasonable performance. 

Single-vertical tuning is easily done by disconnecting the bottom of the 
vertical element of the other three elements. We trimmed the radials for 
resonance (tune for X=0; SWR is meaningless) at the offset freq, which turned 
out to be about 70 kHz, so 3680 was the target. At resonance, they looked like 
40-45 ohms, not too far from the holy grail ground-mounted vertical.

Common-mode chokes at the feedpoints are extremely important and most of my 
article is devoted to that subject. The handful of beads recommended by Comtek 
isn’t really enough but it’s better than nothing. Optimum solutions include: 70 
Fair-Rite 2631102002 beads on each feedline; Transition to RG302 (75-ohm) and 
use many smaller beads (ON4UN used 100 type 73 beads in this configuration), or 
wind it around a toroid (12T on 2.4 inch type 31); Or transition to a bifilar 
choke as I did.

More radials will reduce ground losses. We went with two 1/4-wave radials as a 
tradeoff between performance and the practical problem of routing many elevated 
wires. Symmetrical arrangements can improve the final pattern. 

With the system fully configured, pay more attention to the dump power from the 
hybrid than SWR. Bandwidth is best defined by setting a limit on dump power, 
say 10% of applied power (0.5 dB). Our system had a 275 kHz bandwidth by this 
criterion. SWR should change slowly and actually is more useful as an indicator 
that something has failed.

I can also recommend spending time with at least a basic EZNEC simulation to 
see what happens as you vary the geometry etc. 

Gary NA6O
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>