A poll of 6? Well thats enough to invade a counrty!
> [Original Message]
> From: Rusty Boling <ae4bk@yahoo.com>
> To: VHF CONTESTING <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
> Date: 8/24/2005 7:38:16 AM
> Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Poll
>
> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 13:57:06 -0500
> From: "Bob Naumann - W5OV" <w5ov@w5ov.com>
> Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Poll
> To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
> Message-ID: <E1E7dxK-0000to-E2@www3.qth.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Rusty said:
>
> "most everyone that responded thinks captive roving, pack roving, and
> circle roving are good ideas and that most of the hams that responded
> to me use or have used these tactics".
>
> What about the hundreds (perhaps thousands?) who didn't respond?
>
> How many responses did you get?
>
> Hey Bob, I only got 6 responses total. Much less than I would have
expected considering the topic. Not that I wanted to sort through
thousands of emails, but I would have figured it would have been a little
more even given previous discussions on this list. I suspected there was a
majority that considered the tactics unethical (per previous posts), but as
far as the answers I got back, it was not the case. It was very surprising
to say the least. It is not a big deal to me personally, because I am not
a rover and don't plan on being one. I had no idea that what was happening
with these tactics was the status quo versus the exception to the rule. I
can't say that I will ever look upon VHF contesting quite the same.
73...Rusty NE4ME
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|