A "diversion" from the present thread...are there any ROVERS who have
used/are using LoTW?
As I understand...a "Separate" "Key" (or security certificate) is needed for
EACH Location (Grid Square) from which a ROVER wants to enter QSOs...a real
PITA (that's Pain In The Anterior or you may select a different "A" word) if
you ask me. Seems like there's GOT to be a BETTER way to to do that withOUT
degrading the "integrity" of the LoTW system.
If my understanding is wrong, I welcome correction/clarification!
73, JK
>From: KA6AMD <ka6amd@earthlink.net>
>To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] WAHOO - LoTW Double Whammy(and a half)
>Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 22:18:50 -0700
>
>I definitely think that if LoTW supported VUCC, then a lot more VHFers
>would use it.
>
>I am currently converting all of my old paper logs to LoTW and got a QSL
>tonight from way back in 1979!
>73, Erich KA6AMD
>DM15
>
>R Johnson wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> > LoTW works FB as far as it presently goes.
> >
> > It works better when you supply all of your station info !!!
> >
> > It would work even better if it supported "VUCC" !!!
> > [snip]
> >
> > 73
> > Bob, K1VU
> >
> >
> >
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|