Keith.
What you say is true IF you believe that contesters in DM65, DM58 and other
dark holes are in serious competition with the East Coast contesting hordes.
We are not and we will never be without some major changes in scoring.
Instead, we are competing regionally. So, if I go to the trouble of building a
2.3GHz and up station in DM65 and make a few contacts, then I'd want my score
to reflect that significant extra effort and expense over a regional station
which just concentrates on 6, 2 and 70.
If we weighted contest scores by the inverse of the local amateur radio
population density then we can have flat scoring for all bands but that's never
going to happen.
Bill / AI5I
> Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 07:47:56 -0700
> From: w9rm@calmesapartners.com
> To: VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Question to the group
>
> East coast-centric view ? It's anything but.
>
> High points for QSO's above 222 is one of the east coasts big
> advantages. They are the guys with the population to make that work
> for them. Frankly, I'm surprised to hear a experienced east coast VHF
> contester like Terry make that statement. Maybe there's hope for us
> barbarians out where we have a hard time working our own grid - on any
> band.
>
> Jay W9RM DM58
>
> Keith J Morehouse
> Managing Partner
> Calmesa Partners G.P.
> Olathe, CO
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 6:00 AM, Bill Junor <junorwider@msn.com> wrote:
> > Terry.
> >
> > Yours is a very East-Coast-centric view of VHF/UHF contesting.
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|