To: | <writelog@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [WriteLog] Packet spots |
From: | Chad.Kurszewski@motorola.com (Kurszewski Chad-WCK005) |
Date: | Wed, 1 Nov 2000 12:14:34 -0600 |
> >What really got me last weekend had nothing to do with > >Writelog - but rather what appeared to be blatantly > >bogus spots - I can't count the number of times I saw > >a spot for some new one that I needed, clicked on it > >and heard a 1 or 2 or 3 lander calling CQ *exactly* on > >frequency. Is that a coincidence? I somehow doubt > >it... But it is a somewhat clever way to get around > >the rule against self-spotting... > > I don't think there was any foul play going on. Consider these scenarios: > And another scenario: Even though you just got the spot, it was over 1 hour old. -- WWW: http://www.writelog.com/ Submissions: writelog@contesting.com Administrative requests: writelog-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-writelog@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [WriteLog] Macro Express (was: A repeat request), Barry N1EU |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [WriteLog] Packet spots, Kurszewski Chad-WCK005 |
Previous by Thread: | [WriteLog] Incoming WAV Comparisons, Byron Peebles |
Next by Thread: | [WriteLog] Packet spots, Kurszewski Chad-WCK005 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |