Ed,
You would not only need a new contest category, your, "android",
would need to be licensed since it would be the only control
operator present ;-)
----
73, Rich - W3ZJ
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-writelog@contesting.com
> [mailto:owner-writelog@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Ed Sleight
> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 13:19 PM
> To: writelog@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [WriteLog]
>
>
>
> After fighting my way through the CW SS with Writelog (
> with all due
> emphasis on the problem being my lack of knowledge ), I
> was struck with
> a question for you guys in the upper 99.9%.
>
> The use of .wav files to generate calls and reports
> works extremely
> well.
>
> Would it not be a logical extension that incoming audio
> could also be
> compared to the .wav files? And therefore,
> automatically placed in the
> proper logging spots? For instance, if K 4 S B are
> seperate wave files,
> and the incomming audio was K4SB, could it not be
> decoded as such? I
> realize that speed would be a determining factor, but
> if a Ramdrive of
> sufficient size were created containing all the .wav
> files, it would
> seem that would not be a problem.
>
> After that, I want to turn the radio on, start
> WriteLog, connect to the
> packet cluster, use the primary radio to call CQ ( with
> band changes
> automatically generated by rate or packet spots ), use
> the second radio
> to work multis, and come back 48 hours later to see how
> I've done.
>
> Of course, a new category of "No operator" would have
> to be established.
>
> ):>
>
> Ed
>
> --
> WWW: http://www.writelog.com/
> Submissions: writelog@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: writelog-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-writelog@contesting.com
>
>
--
WWW: http://www.writelog.com/
Submissions: writelog@contesting.com
Administrative requests: writelog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-writelog@contesting.com
|