Re: [WriteLog] An answer for K6VVA & Note to Wayne

[George Johnson <w1zt@comcast.net>]

Rick,
I think the appropriate expression is "watch out for what you wish for".
I would suggest trying the existing audio package and setup before you get 
too excited about an extension.  WriteLog is used by most of us as a 
contesting aid and if you are contesting with it you might find that things 
might be "possible" but not necessarily helpful in a contest.

The automatic audio robot is interesting but a lot of work to set up and 
many have simply found that it is "interesting" but doesn't help to improve 
your contest experience.

Give the existing configuration a try and see how much you can do with 
it.  There is quite a bit there right now.
73 and good luck,
George .. W1ZT

At 08:27 AM 1/3/2004, Eric Hilding wrote:
> Ian White, G3SEK commented:
>
> > George Johnson wrote:
> > >Yes, Whitey, K1VV wrote a procedure he used to record, edit, and time
> > >"squeeze" wav files for contest use with WriteLog.  Several people have
> > >tried it with some success.  The results reflect the amount of time you
> > >would be willing to put into the editing process.  I thought I had seen
> > >it on the K9JY web site but I didn't find it just now.  It was in a
> > >YCCC publication.
> >
> > Thanks, George - you were right in every detail. The article is now part
> > of a very large page about "auto messaging" on the K9JY site, at:
> >
> > http://www.k9jy.com/WriteLog%20Windows/auto_messaging.htm
> >
> > Click on "How to *Really* automate SSB messages".
> >
> > They've made it so simple - Windows Sound Recorder and your transceiver
> > are all the tools you need.
>
> Ian:
>
> I must have missed George's post, so THANK YOU...because in the article I 
> discovered that a 'hook' is already in WL to look for more-than-one-digit 
> serial number .wav files and play them if they exist (reference the 40.wav 
> vs. 4.wav PLUS 0.wav example.
>
> Now, if we can just get one small tweak to WL (using the same or similar 
> programming logic that exists to handle the serial number), this will open 
> up "New Horizons" to those of us willing to take .wav file voice-keying 
> greatly b-e-y-o-n-d the current robotic sounding level.
>
> This would be a tremendous leap forward.
>
> (Note to Wayne):  If you don't want to make this minor mod for the General 
> WL release, how much would you charge me to put this callsign capability 
> in MY copy of WL?  (Umh, if you later end up incorporating it into a 
> General release...well, then a refund would probably be appropriate :-)
>
> Thank you.
>
> 73...
>
> Rick, K6VVA


_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/