WriteLog
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Writelog] RE: fullcallsign.wav voice-keying

To: <writelog@contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [Writelog] RE: fullcallsign.wav voice-keying
From: "Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:57:09 -0700
List-post: <mailto:writelog@contesting.com>
If you go to the original posters site and read the documentation, you will
need to record all the known callsigns ahead of time.  This would be an even
greater task and then have to keep updating the files.  I could see this
file getting pretty large fairly quickly.

Mike
W0MU

-----Original Message-----
From: writelog-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:writelog-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Kurszewski Chad-WCK005
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 9:36 AM
To: writelog@contesting.com
Subject: RE: [Writelog] RE: fullcallsign.wav voice-keying

> Maybe one small improvement would be to allow Writelog to recognize 
> three character callsign combinations -
> giving you <K6.wav> then <VVA.wav>.   That would
> allow people to record prefixes with numbers and suffixes, providing a 
> much better audio flow.

While I agree with you 100%, having recorded combination for all 3 letter
suffixes would be a monumental task....
There are 17,576 three letter combinations.  If you do only two letter
combinations, then it's a measly 676 combinations.  Of course, throwing
numbers into the fray increases it again, but you could judiciously choose
those combinations to match known letter/number prefixes.

Chad WE9V
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/

_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>