Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:johnclif@ix.netcom.com: 126 ]

Total 126 documents matching your query.

41. [TenTec] Omni VI alignment... (score: 1)
Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 04:33:12 -0800
Greetings, I recently performed the following mods on my Omni VI/Option 1: - replaced the original crystal oven on the Logic Board with a Ten-Tec supplied TXCO - replaced the BFO crystals on the TX A
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00223.html (7,985 bytes)

42. [TenTec] Omni VI BFO crystal replacement and alignment ?s... (score: 1)
Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 13:09:54 -0800
Greetings, I have an Omni VI/Option 1, #11A10614 that I am trying to align after replacing the crystal oven with a Ten-Tec-supplied TXCO and ICM-supplied 5 ppm thermally-stable BFO crystals (Y1 and Y
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00225.html (10,746 bytes)

43. [TenTec] More Omni VI alignment/functioning questions... (score: 1)
Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 21:59:30 -0800
Thanks to those who contacted me off-list... the information was very helpful. I have learned (from Ten-Tec) that the 9.0033 Mhz crystal and padding capacitor WAS factory installed and was a factory
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00257.html (11,279 bytes)

44. [TenTec] More Omni VI alignment/functioning questions... (score: 1)
Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 00:51:55 -0800
Yes, but you must use the correct trimmer caps. The proper Omni VI BFO alignment (TX Audio Board #81597 Rev. F and earlier) is as follows: - You will need an ACCURATE high-resolution frequency counte
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00259.html (10,736 bytes)

45. [TenTec] More Omni VI alignment/functioning questions... (score: 1)
Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 01:09:00 -0800
Well, I've gotten LSB and USB aligned. CW is proving to be a bear. The original padding cap had a value of 56pF. That allowed me to get the freq down to 9.001900 Hz (needs to be 9.000400 Hz). I added
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00260.html (8,736 bytes)

46. [TenTec] More Omni VI alignment/functioning questions... (score: 1)
Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:56:10 -0800
I found the problem. Turns out that there is a capacitance spec to the BFO crystals. The original order that Dave Hammond placed was for 32pF crystals, however ICM suggested that perhaps these have a
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00295.html (8,222 bytes)

47. [TenTec] WOW SERVICE on ARGO V! (score: 1)
Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 01:06:51 -0800
My limited experience with Ten-Tec has shown them to be very good at product (and customer) service. However, the quality of technical information is dependent upon the person you reach (as it is wit
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00475.html (9,054 bytes)

48. [TenTec] cascaded filters was Omni V audio (score: 1)
Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:11:24 -0800
Re wider filters and SSB quality... I have listened to SSB on my Drake R8A with 4 kHz and 6 kHz filters. Sure, SSB sounds 'nicer' with a wider filter but this affects aesthetics more than readability
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00529.html (10,650 bytes)

49. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus alignment without a freq ctr? (score: 1)
Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:15:31 -0800
...names have been deleted to protect the embarrassed... if someone else has a better procedure please post it. - jgc Hello Jxxxx, Flying by the seat of my pants here... it's going to REALLY be hard
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00560.html (9,649 bytes)

50. [TenTec] cascaded filters was Omni V audio (score: 1)
Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:29:29 -0800
First, note that these opinions are mine, and based upon my experiences and research. I will always defer to someone who is more knowledgeable. Re cascading identical bandwidth filters without using
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00561.html (8,815 bytes)

51. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus alignment without a freq ctr? (score: 1)
Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 04:03:53 -0800
I agree that using WWV to align the TXCO/crystal oven (VI+/VI) is faster and better than using a frequency counter, but.... The original post I replied to was from a ham who had dinked with his BFO t
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00582.html (9,099 bytes)

52. [TenTec] RE: Omni VI Plus freq. readout and killing the messenger (score: 1)
Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:47:07 -0700
I for one would like to thank Dave Hammond for his posts. The symptoms he describes are exactly what I have encountered, and his conclusions to its causes are logical. I have gone back thru the archi
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00120.html (8,804 bytes)

53. [TenTec] Re: Jupiter firmware problems...NOT! (SO!... ) (score: 1)
Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 16:24:09 -0700
Whether or not I own a Jupiter, or whether or not I own a Ten-Tec radio at all, is totally irrelevant to this discussion. I, as an owner of Ten-Tec equipment and a potential owner of new equipment, r
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00033.html (11,267 bytes)

54. [TenTec] Paying for updates... YES! (score: 1)
Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 19:11:28 -0700
I guess I started the 'pay for updates' idea on this list... and I still stand by it. I can understand why Ten-Tec gives away updates... it is a selling/marketing feature. Buy a radio and know that i
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00171.html (9,904 bytes)

55. [TenTec] RE: This is getting boring... (score: 1)
Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 23:41:35 -0700
I think this is a great reflector. I mostly lurk (except when I feel I can contribute something), and I like reading about antennas, Ten-Tec history, other peoples' operating experiences, technical q
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00177.html (7,185 bytes)

56. [TenTec] Differences between VI upgrade(s) and VI+... (score: 1)
Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 16:05:45 -0700
I thought that an Omni VI Opt 3 was a VI with a new 9Mhz board (VI+), new parts (buttons, black button bezel from the VI+) to support the extra 9Mhz slot, and the VI+ DSP. The Opt1 was just the VI+ D
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00325.html (7,132 bytes)

57. [TenTec] Omni VI calibration... (score: 1)
Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 14:15:35 -0700
Greetings, I'm sure that many of you have read the article on frequency calibration in the latest QST. I decided to verify the calibration of my two main rigs (Omni VI, Elecraft K2) to WWV and see ho
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00446.html (8,755 bytes)

58. [TenTec] Jupiter firmware problems & Ten-Tec quality control... (score: 1)
Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 14:07:43 -0700
As someone who spent many years designing, developing, and successfully releasing commercial software that has brought in maybe half a billion dollars in revenue while I was there, seems to me the pr
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00460.html (12,251 bytes)

59. [TenTec] Re: Jupiter firmware problems...NOT! (SO!... ) (score: 1)
Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:27:06 -0700
[Note: A correspondent informed me that Ten-Tec's firmware is now outsourced to a company called RFSquared... so while I am using "Ten-Tec" in this post, RFSquared should certainly be getting the hea
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00596.html (11,145 bytes)

60. [TenTec] Updating Radios... (score: 1)
Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 13:12:39 -0700
I for one would like to see Ten-Tec go to a subscription base for their software upgrades. Purchasers would get one year of free upgrades, after which they could pay a nominal annual fee ($25 or ther
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00604.html (9,197 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu