Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:bastinj@gmail.com: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] EUHFC 2005 (score: 1)
Author: John Bastin K8AJS <bastinj@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 07:40:33 -0400
EU HF Championship is 6 August. WAEDC is 13-14 August. Hope this helps. 73, John E Bastin, K8AJS jbastin@sssnet.com http://www.qsl.net/k8ajs/ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00097.html (7,911 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] An idea for contest support (score: 1)
Author: John Bastin K8AJS <bastinj@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 08:23:45 -0400
For what it's worth, I'll pass along a postage tip that I learned while working on mailing invitations for a couple of weddings. Not sure where it originally came from, but it has definitely helped.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00100.html (9,519 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] LOTW Cert. Renewal (score: 1)
Author: John Bastin K8AJS <bastinj@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:37:25 -0400
Hmmm...wonder when they started that. Mine expired in September so I renewed it the last day of August and it's only good for one year. I have another certificate for an old callsign that expires in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00230.html (7,286 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] LOTW Cert. Renewal (score: 1)
Author: John Bastin K8AJS <bastinj@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:30:08 -0400
You just answered your own question. I'm not done getting all my old logs on the computer yet, so I will have more contacts to upload. 73, John E Bastin, K8AJS jbastin@sssnet.com http://www.qsl.net/k
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00321.html (8,146 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] contest calendar for outlook (score: 1)
Author: John Bastin K8AJS <bastinj@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 11:50:22 -0500
Nobody seems to have mentioned it, but I subscribe to a contesting calendar that's available using iCalShare http://icalshare.com/article.php?story=20040114094342513 I'm using a Mac and the contest d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00149.html (8,524 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] He sends my callsign (score: 1)
Author: John Bastin K8AJS <bastinj@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:27:31 -0500
So that you know that he got your callsign correct. Without that, IMO, it's not a complete exchange. I believe so. As with all such questions, YMMV. John E Bastin, K8AJS jbastin@sssnet.com http://www
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00318.html (8,662 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] What to expect from 10 meters??? (score: 1)
Author: John Bastin K8AJS <bastinj@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 15:46:37 -0500
I'm not sure what advantage this would deliver. A half-wave dipole on 80 meters, depending on where in the band it is cut for, is very close to 7 half waves on 10. With careful pruning, you can make
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00176.html (9,955 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmers etc (score: 1)
Author: John Bastin <bastinj@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:04:35 -0400
Speaking for myself, I disagree. The people who are there for the love of it could care less what technology the other contesters are using. For myself, I'm a DXer first and a contester second. I get
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00066.html (9,160 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmers etc (score: 1)
Author: John Bastin <bastinj@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 07:45:31 -0400
I looked again at what I said, and I guess it was said poorly; in no way did I mean to imply that slower-speed ops "don't really love" contesting. Maybe so. I can only speak for myself when I say tha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00085.html (9,120 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX RTTY Logs (score: 1)
Author: John Bastin <bastinj@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 18:39:29 -0500
I tried the submittal tool and it said that everything was just fine. When the log was submitted, I got an email from the robot informing me that my Location: field was missing from the header and on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00216.html (7,479 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Question (score: 1)
Author: John Bastin <bastinj@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 18:58:55 -0500
That's one interpretation. What the rules actually say is: (From the ARRL General Rules for Contests Under 30MHz) 2.3.1.Multioperator, Single Transmitter: Stations are allowed only one transmitted si
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00217.html (10,159 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Question (score: 1)
Author: John Bastin <bastinj@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:40:14 -0500
AMEN! I strongly support this request. It would greatly reduce the problem with understanding the rules of ARRL contests, and lessen the confusion we've seen amply demonstrated here. 73, John K8AJS b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00232.html (8,577 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time for a new cq-contest forum format? (score: 1)
Author: John E Bastin <bastinj@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 07:04:25 -0500
Like many others who have commented, I dislike web-based email and would likely not keep getting this list if that was the only way it was available. My email client has no problem sorting the conver
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00458.html (9,493 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Latency (score: 1)
Author: John E Bastin <bastinj@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 15:51:51 -0500
Im not a big gun contester, and I almost always contest using low power; my repeat CQ is set at 4 seconds, and occasionally I get someone coming in just as the CQ starts up. Thank goodness for QSK. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00487.html (8,635 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Survey Results - part 2 (score: 1)
Author: John E Bastin <bastinj@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 17:09:13 -0500
Im an op that doesnt use packet, and I get screwed every contest anyway, waiting on the ops calling CQ that are working all the packet junkies and dont ID for 10 minutes or more at a time. Im pulled
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00618.html (9,381 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Tennessee QSO Party Results (score: 1)
Author: John E Bastin <bastinj@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 08:52:20 -0500
I second that. I also received my TnQP certificate with the additional newsletter this past week. Its a nice package demonstrating good thought and efforts by the TCG. Thanks very much! Ill make sure
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00004.html (7,444 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu