- 61. [TenTec] Jupiter versus Paragon... (score: 1)
- Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
- Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 14:13:55 -0700
- I'd like to hear comments from those who have owned both rigs, pros and cons. I know about the PLL problems with the Paragon. How does receiver sensitivity compare to that of the Jupiter? I assume th
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00400.html (6,986 bytes)
- 62. [TenTec] RE: 60m for Omni VI... (score: 1)
- Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
- Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 14:13:56 -0700
- Seems that this would need some hardware mods/additions... not just firmware mods. I know that the K2 will have to have an additional board added that allows the VFO to tune that band. Isn't the meth
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00401.html (7,068 bytes)
- 63. [TenTec] RE: TenTec net... (score: 1)
- Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
- Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 14:13:56 -0700
- Is the 14.267 ham on earlier, and actively engaged in a QSO? Then he has the frequency. If this is his favorite frequency, perhaps if we all wrote him and asked him to refrain from QSOs... or join th
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00402.html (7,752 bytes)
- 64. [TenTec] New 60m band... (score: 1)
- Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
- Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 22:36:35 -0700
- Greetings, Just wondering if Ten-Tec is going to make an upgrade path available for those of us who own Omni VIs and VI+s for this new band. Also, will the Orion support this band (perhaps with a sof
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00254.html (6,739 bytes)
- 65. [TenTec] Pricing... (score: 1)
- Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 00:52:01 -0700
- As a small business owner myself, I understand (and agree with) Ten-Tec's decision to charge as much as the market will bear. How much the market will bear is the question though, isn't it? Re the Ar
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00671.html (9,021 bytes)
- 66. [TenTec] 302 Remote... will it work w/Omni VI? (score: 1)
- Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
- Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 12:14:44 -0800
- The subject sez it all... will the Pegasus/Jupiter remotes work with the Omni VI? If not, can they be modified easily? Thanks, - jgc John Clifford KD7KGX Heathkit HW-9 WARC/HFT-9/HM-9 Elecraft K2 #16
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00129.html (6,738 bytes)
- 67. [TenTec] Orion feedback... (score: 1)
- Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
- Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 19:13:43 -0800
- Based upon the pictures, etc., I think the Orion is going to be a great rig (and I will probably buy one). However... I'd like to see some changes made before the rig is released. First and most impo
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00390.html (9,969 bytes)
- 68. [TenTec] RE: PBT, extra power (score: 1)
- Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 15:28:15 -0800
- I'd like to see the Orion have the ability to run an extra clean SSB signal, like the FT-1000 MP Mk V, so that if one is driving an amp via SSB, the cleanest possible signal is being put out. I'd rat
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00727.html (8,168 bytes)
- 69. [TenTec] RE: Next Filter (score: 1)
- Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
- Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 19:40:26 -0800
- I commonly use both the 500 and 250 Hz filters in the 6 Mhz IF for PSK31 decoding, and find that when combined with PBT they are just the ticket for eliminating interference from strong signals. I al
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00100.html (7,343 bytes)
- 70. [TenTec] Re: Orion... (score: 1)
- Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 23:04:03 -0800
- Hello Scott, Thanks for the information. This sounds like a radio that I would be interested in to replace/augment my Omni VI/Opt 1. Some suggestions... please consider changing the entire paradigm o
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00434.html (9,146 bytes)
- 71. [TenTec] RE: 516... or why the Orion is more exciting (score: 1)
- Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
- Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 20:34:17 -0800
- I think it's fair to say that more people will be interested in the Orion versus the new 516 QRP rig. Why? Well... here's why from my point of view. The 516 doesn't excite me because there's nothing
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00467.html (9,704 bytes)
- 72. [TenTec] RE: 516... or why the Orion is more exciting (score: 1)
- Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 00:12:44 -0800
- Hello Stuart, I don't think that the Orion is meant to compete with the 516, or vice-versa, and I also don't think that one single customer will be faced with the dilemna of buying one or the other,
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00548.html (10,648 bytes)
- 73. [TenTec] RE: Info about OMNI VI and VI+ (score: 1)
- Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
- Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 22:19:44 -0800
- There were three upgrade paths offered for the original Omni VI: - Option 1 added the VI+ DSP and firmware, and re-assigned front panel keys were provided with stickers to indicate their new function
- /archives//html/TenTec/2001-12/msg00232.html (14,518 bytes)
- 74. [TenTec] N4PY software... (score: 1)
- Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
- Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 10:51:25 -0800
- Saw the postings and wondered... does this work with the Omni VI as well as the Omni V.9? Thanks, - jgc John Clifford KD7KGX Heathkit HW-9 WARC/HFT-9/HM-9 Elecraft K2 #1678 /KSB2/KIO2/KBT2/KAT2/KNB2/
- /archives//html/TenTec/2001-11/msg00083.html (6,488 bytes)
- 75. [TenTec] Group filter purchase... let's save $$ (score: 1)
- Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
- Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 03:29:30 -0700
- Is anyone interested in buying some of the Inrad filters for their Ten-Tec rig? If so, let's get together and make one order to save some money. I want/need three filters, so I'd earn the 5% by mysel
- /archives//html/TenTec/2001-10/msg00020.html (7,545 bytes)
- 76. [TenTec] Changing the front pushbuttons on an Omni VI (score: 1)
- Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
- Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 21:48:46 -0700
- Greetings, I recently obtained some new pushbuttons for my Omni VI front panel to replace the 'upgraded' buttons with the Option 1 upgrade. How do I take the front plate off of an Omni VI to replace
- /archives//html/TenTec/2001-10/msg00104.html (6,771 bytes)
- 77. [TenTec] Anyone using their Omni VI or VI+ with MixW v2.0? (score: 1)
- Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 17:16:50 -0700
- If anyone is using MixW v2.0 with their Omni VI or VI+, please let me know how you are configured. I've tried the standalone ICOM735 and the IC-735 option under ICOM, and neither support transmit via
- /archives//html/TenTec/2001-10/msg00165.html (7,489 bytes)
- 78. [TenTec] Anyone using their Omni VI or VI+ with MixW v2.0? (score: 1)
- Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 09:59:44 -0700
- I determined that the problem lies in the software... it is a bug/limitation in MixW 2.0. Evidently, the Omni VI's CAT command set is a superset of the Icom IC-735. Ten-Tec extensions include the com
- /archives//html/TenTec/2001-10/msg00180.html (7,909 bytes)
- 79. [TenTec] Ten-Tec etc. (score: 1)
- Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 10:54:53 -0700
- I was very pleased by the prompt attention paid to my recent filter (and obligatory coffee cup) order from Ten-Tec. Everything was shipped the next day, got here in great shape, and having a complete
- /archives//html/TenTec/2001-10/msg00181.html (12,652 bytes)
- 80. [TenTec] RE: Fuzzy Jupiter note (score: 1)
- Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 14:39:23 -0800
- I assume from the posting that what people are complaining about is NOT the actual transmitted note, but instead the sidetone that the Jupiter emits so that the operator can hear his CW. I have worke
- /archives//html/TenTec/2001-10/msg00263.html (7,709 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu