Search String: Display: Description: Sort:


References: [ 81 ]

Total 81 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ban all contest spotting? (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:46:09 -0700
As a QRP station most of the time, as soon as someone was spotted it was too late for me to try! So I'd look at all the other stations I needed and would often find the crowd thinned out on some of t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00058.html (8,935 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi-Single Band Change Rule (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:30:17 -0700
Hi All, Maybe it's just me but...... When I see Multi-Single, my mind tells me that that class **should** be one where you have more than one operator and only one Tx. My mind keeps telling me that s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00367.html (8,553 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Replacement for Novice Roundup? (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:41:48 -0700
WN6JXO way back in 51 or 52, can't remember which! I don't think there was a NR back then! Novice was only good for 1 year and non-renewable. I spend a lot of time with the QRP crowd which includes a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00433.html (10,163 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW? (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 09:09:58 -0700
I think there is something missing..... During that 500 per hour rate, you spend at least half that time sending your exchange so you would have to double the typing rate during RX. OK, back in my ho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00197.html (8,895 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rookie Contest (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:09:42 -0700
I don't like this idea as mandatory either. I could see it as an option..... maybe. Many reasons why it would keep a lot of people out of the contest. My connection is NOT stable out here in the wild
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00100.html (9,455 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 10:24:05 -0700
Hehehehehe! I got my license back in 1951 or 52. I was too late to remember any flap about using bugs. But I do remember all the letters/articles in the magazines about how electronic keyers were goi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00231.html (10,116 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Contests (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 21:26:07 -0600
Hi All, I would like to try some RTTY contesting this winter. The rig is an FT-1000 MP. What is the best way to connect to the computer? I have a RIGblaster pro that I have never used. Is this a good
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-05/msg00134.html (8,298 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of CW decoders in contests (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 20:38:42 -0600
Think about this: If an extra 1,000 people got into the contest only because they could use a code reader, that's another 1,000 Q's we might get to help our scores. Until it gets to the point, if it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-05/msg00213.html (9,853 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] WPX this weekend (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 20:42:01 -0600
Hi All, I'll be on 40m as much as I can if anyone needs KU7. QRP and not much of an antenna. And the cable to go from the computer to the rig for keying is down in AZ sitting with the MP so I'll be h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-05/msg00214.html (9,671 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] WPX Thank you (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 12:46:18 -0600
I would like to thank everyone who worked so hard to dig my little signal out of the mud and decode, by whatever means, my very rusty hand/keyer sending. I sure do miss my Force12 @85' with it's 2 el
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00026.html (7,134 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] TB-wires WPX category (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <>
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 14:49:54 -0600
Hi Randy, Maybe a tribander should be defined as having only one driven element for all 3 bands. OK, back in my hole, Ron, KU7Y SOWP 5545M Caldwell, ID __________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00084.html (8,634 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] /QRP (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:41:31 -0600
Let me throw something else out here..... First, I agree with not using /qrp when calling a station..... nothing but a time waster IMHO. Same holds true for DX pileups! But... when I would be running
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00140.html (7,923 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] /QRP (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:10:34 -0600
I think all QRPers understand that they are not going to hold a prime run frequency very long! And it sure doesn't make sense to try and fight for it either! :-) But when you do get lucky and hold a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00142.html (8,103 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] /QRP (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:43:00 -0600
I have always said that the only reason I ever got a fair score was because of all the nice folks who took the time to dig me out of the mud! Many thanks to you all..... and I hope to give many of y
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00155.html (8,470 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Would You Still Contest? (score: 1)
Author: KU7Y <>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 19:36:32 -0700
You bet! All I have to do now is get something up for an antenna! QRP vs. QRO skills...... I don't think there is any real difference. Each one has it's own challenges and each op needs to have the a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00149.html (8,522 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best SS exchange yet! (score: 1)
Author: KU7Y <>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:14:24 -0700
Way back when I was in HS and first got my license, I got the call of W6JXO. My two friends who got me into this hobby, W6KHK (SK) and W6DPL (no longer licensed) looked at each other for a minute and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00396.html (8,925 bytes)

17. [CQ-Contest] Logging program trouble (score: 1)
Author: KU7Y <>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 19:13:00 -0700
Hi All, I made a few contacts on 15m and would like to send in a log. I have tried N1NN and TR4W plus some other free ones but can not get any of them to work! They all can't seem to understand that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00501.html (7,381 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging program trouble (score: 1)
Author: KU7Y <>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:21:19 -0700
Thanks to everyone for their help. I've got things under control now. Hope to see you all in the 10m test. OK, back in my hole, Ron, KU7Y SOWP 5545M Brenda, AZ (Winter) Caldwell, ID (Summer) ku7y@qsl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00519.html (7,374 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] A Few Questions about Holes (score: 1)
Author: KU7Y <>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:26:57 -0700
1) Do you have a hole in both QTH's? No, it's just one hole with 2 entrances. 2) If so, are they the same size or is one bigger than the other? NA 3) Do you need any form of heat/AC in either of them
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00525.html (9,686 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] A Few Questions about Holes (score: 1)
Author: KU7Y <>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:30:25 -0700
Did you paint your hole(s) black? No, it's done in natural earth tones. If so, were you playing Rolling Stones music while you did? No, the only music allowed in the hole is CW or Bluegrass. Or is th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00528.html (7,812 bytes)

This search system is powered by Namazu