Search String: Display: Description: Sort:


References: [ 324 ]

Total 324 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Sprint Results (score: 1)
Author: <>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 17:13:53 -0500
Since Tree can now get the CW Sprint results out a couple weeks after the contest does that mean we can have more than 2 CW Sprints a year ??? Please !!!! How about having them quarterly ??? Jeff ___
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00019.html (7,643 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Biggest 20M and other antenna arrays (WA3FET) (score: 1)
Author: <>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:50:46 -0500
The largest 20M antennas that I think anyone probably ever used was when several of us were able to get government permission to use the VOA curtain array at Bethany, Ohio for a day before it was shu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00141.html (8,486 bytes)

23. [CQ-Contest] Remembering the BEST TIMES at Multi-Multi Operations..... (score: 1)
Author: <>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:44:13 -0500
I have been part of many M/M operations over the years but I think the most interesting was the K3UA operations we did in the ARRL June VHF contest back in the early 90's (?) The operator list was no
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00330.html (10,069 bytes)

24. [CQ-Contest] Georgia QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: <>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 11:45:09 -0500
Hello All... The Georgia QSO Party will be held in a few weeks from now... Apr 9-10th. Please note that Mike, NE4S, will be taking over the reigns from me. Most of the contest announcements still hav
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00366.html (7,138 bytes)

25. [CQ-Contest] Barking Up the Wrong ARRL DX Tree (score: 1)
Author: "Jeffrey D Clarke" <>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 18:58:42 -0400
If you are frustrated about trying to win a DX contest from home there is a simple solution. Do what I do and go be the DX that everyone is chasing. I realized a long time ago that I would never have
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00122.html (7,540 bytes)

26. [CQ-Contest] ARRL Contest Rules and Canada (score: 1)
Author: <>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:09:22 -0400
While it's hard to be sympathic to someone on the East Coast griping about a disadvantage in a DX contest I have to agree with KQ2M on his comments 100%.... No disrespect to my Canadian contesting fr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00163.html (9,007 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Canada versus USA (score: 1)
Author: <>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:27:28 -0400
It is because the interest in contesting is poor in Canada. If someone built a big station in eastern Canada they would do pretty well. Case in point - VY2ZM. Also look at VE1JF who has been placing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00194.html (11,877 bytes)

28. [CQ-Contest] Dayton Forum Rooms for DX/Contesting (score: 1)
Author: <>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 13:02:11 -0400
I am glad to see the antenna/ contesting forums move. I have attended the Hamvention for years and it always sucked having the forums in inside the hot and uncomfortable Hara Arena. Seeing my contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00408.html (7,774 bytes)

29. [CQ-Contest] NAQP CW - Team Members Needed (score: 1)
Author: <>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 9:16:24 -0500
If anyone is interested in joining one of the SECC NAQP CW teams please reply to me wirh an email. Plenty of slots left... Jeff KU8E So far I have : AA4LR K4NO - FT K4BAI -FT KU8E - FT N4LR N4GG - FT
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00020.html (7,587 bytes)

30. [CQ-Contest] Re: [SECC] DX Participation in NAQP Contests (score: 1)
Author: "Jeffrey D Clarke" <>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 20:45:42 -0500
How about a both a high and low power class for NA too ?? Besides , the stations who always make the top ten in NAQP are the same who regularly operate from big stations that make the top ten in HP i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00363.html (13,326 bytes)

31. Re: [SECC] Re: [CQ-Contest] DX Participation in NAQP Contests (score: 1)
Author: <>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 9:35:45 -0500
NAQP favors the West Coast big time !!!! No way I am going make 400-500 QSO's and 45 mults on both 160 and 80 to counter what you guys do on 15 and 10 meters... We are also are starting to see 40 go
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00376.html (10,452 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: [SECC] DX Participation in NAQP Contests (score: 1)
Author: <>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 9:57:24 -0500
I don't see the problem with having multiple classes... With the computer checking we have it shouldn't be a big deal.... They have different levels in other sports - like auto racing - why not radi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00377.html (10,686 bytes)

33. [CQ-Contest]re: NAQP and the (midwest)(south)east coast (score: 1)
Author: <>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:05:25 -0500
NAQP SSB High Claimed Scores from 3830 : All Single Op LP N6NF 1851 250 10 462,750 N6MJ(@W6KP) 1703 262 10 446,186 SCCC #1 K6LL 1586 264 10 418,704 SCCC #1 K7RL 1595 260 10 414,700 WWDXC W6EEN(N6RT)
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00409.html (11,048 bytes)

34. [CQ-Contest] More NCJ Sprints ??? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeffrey D Clarke" <>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 13:42:02 -0500
Call me crazy but the CW Sprint is my favorite contest... With the quick turnaround of the logs (great job Tree !!) How about having more than two Sprints in a year ?? It would be neat to expermint w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00166.html (8,861 bytes)

35. [CQ-Contest] Re: Bad Sprint Ideas (score: 1)
Author: <>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:26:06 -0500
I think the increase in activity in both the Sprint and NAQP are due to the fact that many people prefer shorter contests now a days. Maybe this is due to the fact that may of us just don't have the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00241.html (8,173 bytes)

36. re:[CQ-Contest] Re: Sad news: Death today of Jim White, K4OJ (score: 1)
Author: <>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 18:07:15 -0500
I was saddened today to hear about Jim's death. I had recently just got to know Jim over the past few years or so from talking with him in Dayton. We had worked each other for many years but never ha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00249.html (8,003 bytes)

37. [CQ-Contest] 2004 ARRL DX CW M/2 Shootout (score: 1)
Author: <>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 12:27:38 -0500
High Claimed DX M/2 Scores - ARRL DX CW PJ2T 8188/352 8,646,528 FS5UQ 7847/348 8,192,268 PJ4R 7849/345 8,120,610 J7OJ 7644/350 8,026,200 What a shootout in the DX M/2 category this year !! Four teams
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00051.html (8,255 bytes)

38. re; [CQ-Contest] Response to K5ZD's comments. (score: 1)
Author: <>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:05:11 -0500
- Is the ARRL contest too long? 48 hours is better than 2 weekends, but would 24 hours be even better? As it is now, there are only a few competitors at the top of each category. Everyone else is in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00233.html (9,323 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting (score: 1)
Author: <>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 16:42:29 -0500
Here we go again...................... I vote leave ALL the contests the way they are....... If we ALL want to win, or level the scoreboard, you need to spend the money, have the location, and pay yo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00582.html (10,327 bytes)

40. Re: Re: [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting (score: 1)
Author: <>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 9:20:07 -0500
Al, I think the case that most have made for removing packet is that people get away with cheating (i.e claiming SO when they are SOA) and the contest sponsors don't do anything about it. I guess I a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00004.html (10,191 bytes)

This search system is powered by Namazu