Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kzerohb@gmail.com: 927 ]

Total 927 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station not giving a check or section (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:39:33 -0800
Probably not. I've read somewhere (probably here) that the log checking software is able to detect "unstable station" exchange information, and does not throw the contact out. 73, de Hans, K0HB _____
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00451.html (9,075 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station not giving a check or section (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:33:09 -0800
Nothing "politically correct" about it, Felipe. The "unstable" refers to the fact that log robot found information in the exchange from a particular station was not consistent throughout the contest.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00459.html (11,885 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spotting Errors (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:13:49 -0800
You shouldn't get NIL'ed, but they will get hit for a busted call. 73 de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00018.html (8,697 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spotting Errors (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:21:04 -0800
Also B and 6. 73, de Hans, K0 _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00063.html (9,063 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dollars/qso score (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:17:54 -0800
I propose that one of those plaques be designated "The Black Hole Award", and that it be awarded to the single operator non-assisted station with the highest score within a 1000KM radius circle cente
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00066.html (8,419 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Hamradio in Viet Nam? (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:14:02 -0800
N0ODK has operated from there. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00114.html (8,447 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Malicious Interference during SS (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:14:28 -0800
Such a rule would destroy SweepStakes. 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinf
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00120.html (7,522 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:56:48 -0800
Fair enough. First, the task here isn't to "educate the masses". ("the masses", what a patronizing term!) The task is to clean up the act of a tiny, tiny minority. And the solution is painfully obvi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00159.html (9,070 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2008 05:09:41 -0800
Well there you have it then. Your good work can and does catch cheaters, and when presented to the contest sponsors, does get logs withdrawn. Good job. The contesting community is in your debt. But a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00181.html (9,333 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] self help during contest (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 17:02:39 -0800
I don't think the issue is so much "when" you do it, but "what" you do. Grooming your log without the pressure of making the next QSO seems to me outside the spirit of the competition. Sitting back
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00225.html (8,166 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] self help during contest (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:29:06 -0800
If it happens in "real time/heat of battle" -- ie., two guys at a M/M listening in parallel headsets and "deciding" seems perfectly acceptable to me. Flagging the QSO for later leisurely playback, re
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00268.html (11,544 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] I've heard it all now! (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 17:34:03 -0800
Well phrased, Rich. Said another way, compliance with 97.307(d) does not give you a free pass to ignore 97.307(c). 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest maili
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00291.html (8,910 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal report (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 03:45:56 -0800
It's not a signal report. It's a "catch your breath place marker" to signal the next thing you hear will be their ARRL section. In CQWW it's there to alert you to visually confirm that they send the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00327.html (8,061 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal Report (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:46:24 -0800
I abso-tively >>LOVE<< it Paul. No way for the receiver to get a good Q except to copy it in real time without any software crutch. 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00354.html (9,422 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal Report (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:57:05 -0800
If you participate in a contest you are ipso-facto a contester. It's like the old joke "now we're just dickering on the price". 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00360.html (9,739 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] Wrap up: signal report (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:21:51 -0800
Yes, I'll be okay with that. 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00385.html (7,232 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] contesting amps (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 04:46:21 -0800
I have an Ameritron AL-1200. You can touch 1.5KW legal (USA) limit on every band, and it's run a lot of contests in perhaps 15 years of use. So far it's been trouble free. I think the 3CX1200A7 is a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00439.html (9,454 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging software prefs (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 03:51:35 -0800
I keep two flavors of loggers on my computer. For general log keeping I use Logger32. It's sort of ugly, the programming conventions aren't very "conventional", but it works, I have several hundred-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00476.html (10,424 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:51:48 -0800
Since my log in CQWW will always be too thin to win any award, the only reason I submit it is to help MWA in the "Club Competition". Not submitting would make me feel good about "retaining the priva
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00509.html (9,084 bytes)

40. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:52:26 -0800
"I know not where he goeth, but I know from where he cometh, for I have seen the thing he speaketh of." Merry Christmas to all, and to all a good log. de Hans, K0HB __________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00510.html (8,962 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu