Search String: Display: Description: Sort:


References: [ 492 ]

Total 492 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Question on Log Checking (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <>
Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 13:06:42 -0400
No - it's the number of QSO's made my F6KHM, as reported in his log. Is the -N because they did not turn in a log, so it could No, he turned in a log. Not in log, you lost the QSO plus a 3 QSO penalt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00088.html (8,399 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] UBN Question (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 17:50:12 -0400
Bill, Do the math ! The non-USA bad QSO's were: 3 points - 121 -B SP4TKL(1) SP4TKR(378)Wn SP4TKB(15) 2 points - 136 -B HR2AGC(1) HR2AHC(500)N HR1AGC(87) 3 points - 179 -B YT3UZ(1) UT3UZ(39) 3 points
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00113.html (9,768 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] UBN call confirmed by LOTW ?!?!?!!? (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 01:12:28 -0400
This is not meant to pick on Jamie... The fact that 36 logs worked 8P1A in CQWW CW probably just means that 35 people jumped on the incorrect 8P1A cluster spot, and didn't take the time and effort to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00171.html (8,689 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Field Day audio clips ? (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <>
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 09:57:00 -0400
I'm looking for some audio snippets from Field Day for a talk I'm giving at the local radio club ? Anyone have any ? Both good and poor operating practices would be instructive. 73, Steve, N2IC _____
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00114.html (6,605 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2006 SCOREBOARD - RELEASE 55/06 (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 08:39:06 -0400
The scoreboard still displays correctly with Firefox after you hit "OK". I presume the warning just means that you'll have to do a refresh every hour. The scoreboard is pretty slick looking ! However
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00307.html (8,832 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Final Score (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 12:11:23 -0400
Hi Mark - Sorry to bust your bubble, but I think you're looking at the QSO points column, not the QSO column. The winner (VE3EJ/VE7ZO) had 2369 QSO's. Thanks for noticing ! Bernie and I considered it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00139.html (9,553 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules forHQ stnsin IARUcontest (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:52:46 -0400
How about simply getting rid of all HQ stations as a special entity ? Create a multi-multi, single-location category, that anyone can enter, rather than this nationalistic entity. 20 years ago, befor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00229.html (9,325 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting in the Sunlight [was: SO1R and SO2R] (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 12:07:16 -0400
There's another aspect of SO2R that makes it less useful than you might think -- SO2R is only useful when you have a band that you can effectively CQ on, and other bands that are effective for S&P at
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00592.html (10,915 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] January 2006 NAQP SSB Preliminary Results (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:02:30 -0400
So, let me get this straight....The published e-mail addresses for NAQP log submission doesn't work ? Uh, shouldn't a high priority be placed on fixing this before the CW NAQP this weekend ? I would
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00618.html (8,347 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Bencher Paddles & Customs/TSA (score: 1)
Author: "Steve London" <>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 20:45:35 -0600
I always take my Bencher paddle carry-on to prevent damage, and yes, security people always ask questions. So what ? They ask what it is. I tell them it's for sending Morse Code. Sometimes they swab
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00238.html (9,607 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why did the Canadians (PT5M) beat the Americans(PW5C) in WRTC 2006? (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 15:31:26 -0400
The original source for the "2 dB improvement" quote probably comes from QST, September 1966, "Station Design for DX" by W3AFM: "Incidentally, in progressive antenna changes at W3AFM, increments of o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00303.html (24,246 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] A CW Contest Do-list [was: CW Accuracy] (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:14:19 -0400
No, Bob, let me tell you how it really works for a loud station in the western USA, like me... N2IC: CQ Contest CQ Contest November Two India Charlie Other station: QRM...QRM...Eight...QRM...Why...QR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00195.html (10,811 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Frequency Conservation (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:18:25 -0400
Guys.... The ARRL has asked for comments on the lastest FCC R&O and it's effect on the current band plans by October 31. See and/or send comments to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00256.html (9,635 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Real Time Scoreboards (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 10:15:48 -0400
The problem is the "strictly defined and enforced" clause. There is no such clause. Consider the following behavior, which is not uncommon for some high-scoring single-op (unassisted) operators: - Lo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00413.html (9,940 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Missing the (zero) point(ers) (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <>
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:21:14 -0500
Most of the limited-experience callers also run low power to poor antennas. Therefore, they not only waste your time, but you risk losing your run frequency (because other stations cannot hear them),
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00019.html (7,509 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] intentional QRMing rare ones - SS SSB (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:07:01 -0500
I agree with Mark. If the other station was there first, then the newly-arrived rare mult doesn't necessarily get priority use of the frequency. This happened to me numerous times in CQWW Phone. I wo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00647.html (8,840 bytes)

17. [CQ-Contest] CQWW CW - Signing your call (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:16:09 -0500
This may be a dupe of a thread from almost a year ago, but I thought the timing was right, with CQWW CW this weekend. Of all the contests, CQWW CW seems to be afflicted with the worst examples of DX
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00648.html (7,754 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Little Old Ladies Changing Computers (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <>
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 15:12:28 -0500
Already exists: Has a TR-like interface, free, open source. Nice work by PA0R. 73, Steve, N2IC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00092.html (8,695 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Random acts of kindness, Unassisted Categories,Rules, etc. (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 14:23:25 -0500
Okay, we have beaten this horse to death, now, for another ethical/rules question. What would you say about a perennial top-10 finisher in Sweepstakes who year-after-year submits his log after the pu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00254.html (9,029 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Gentlemen's Agreement re: Assistance (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:06:53 -0500
I totally support all 5 points, and have operated this way for as long as I can remember. For my own, personal list, I would add: 6. We may only make post-contest changes to our log using information
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00302.html (9,656 bytes)

This search system is powered by Namazu