Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:nss@mwt.net: 697 ]

Total 697 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Time for a Contesting Wikipedia? (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:42:39 -0500
ahh Need signature,, Joe Mayenschein WB9SBD _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00017.html (11,859 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] ETHICS (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 10:48:28 -0500
But in this case at least in the old days if the control op exceeds the stations licence they have to add their call to the sign? Like say K9XX ifs a general and I operate in the extra band shouldnt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00113.html (20,500 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes -Automatic Fill - 93 or 67 (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:07:04 -0500
but then if you are not sending REAL info are you not violating the rules and should be DQ'ed? _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http:/
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00164.html (9,506 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes -Automatic Fill - 93 or 67 (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:52:15 -0500
really, then I wonder why the number was to be the year you got your first ticket, or has that changed too? _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00167.html (11,227 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes -Automatic Fill - 93 or 67 (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:37:42 -0500
de WB9SBD, ck 75 I don't know,, just seems weird to me not to actually use what the rules instruct the entrant to do. Maybe I'm just sentimental or something,, I got my Novice in Sept of 75, and my b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00224.html (12,819 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Time for a Contesting Wikipedia? (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 09:01:24 -0500
What I would LOVE to see, And I'd make one if I was decent at it, (but I'm not.) I'd love to be able to use some sort of a powerpoint presentation or similar about contesting to give a presentation a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00050.html (7,954 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Mobile operation uploads to LOTW (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 10:25:40 -0500
My thoughts also after being out of HF for close to 15 years, I was amazed to see the change on how the portable location was being used. I got my first ticket in 75 and if you were not at your stati
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00088.html (9,488 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2009 17:29:57 -0500
Only if the owner of the call is there with you, _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00104.html (7,661 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Borrowing Callsigns (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:15:43 -0500
Only if YOU and or, a control op is ther that HAS the extra class ticket. A "Superstation" has NO privleges at all. It is the control OP that determines what can eminate from that station. A good exa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00121.html (11,778 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Borrowing Callsigns (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:23:40 -0500
Now, as a slightly different set of seneraios. what happens as you being single OP, as an extra class holder, goes, to a super station that the trustee of the station is ONLY a general. and you are t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00122.html (11,313 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Borrowing Callsigns (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:51:39 -0500
Now, THAT IS an very interesting question,, He can not be the control op of all 5 stations at once,,, it's physically impossible for him to be at every operating station at all times. to make sure th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00128.html (11,599 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Xtreme category, catch 22(simple) (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:10:39 -0500
My Ideal contest? More or less all the same general rules we have now for almost any contest. BUT with one major change. And a change that would place a great deal of strategy into it. A time frame l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00273.html (19,688 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] [SPAM] Fw: Re: 59(9) all the time! (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:18:17 -0500
if you really wanted to get picky and technical (just poking fun at this topic here guys) but if the 599 is breaking the rules in the most pure sence, then what about 5TT? he he he jOE wb9sbd _______
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00384.html (10,821 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting Compendium - help needed (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:45:26 -0500
How about Old Tube Rigs, After participating in Field Day this past weekend, I dearly miss my old Drake TR-4. No bells and whistles, no special filters etc. But as an example, when I had it three sta
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00010.html (9,895 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting rationale (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:28:37 -0500
I'll take it back another step, How about the local 2 meter spotting network frequency, all FM voice.. Joe WB9SBD _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00286.html (13,602 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ten Commandments for Contesters (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:01:15 -0500
I like the abiding by the rules, TO THE LETTER, but again I'm in the minority on that one. Joe WB9SBD _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00127.html (8,546 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Inspections (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:10:36 -0500
WOW, Now what started all this? And how is it being Paid for? is my first thoughts? Secondly is Who are these people,, not saying anything bad about them, but it seems weird to me that someone that i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00143.html (9,216 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Inspections (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:54:52 -0500
How about, Anything goes, there are no sub classes for low ower or single op or whatever. brimng what ya got and can. don't have a KW too bad, don't have any friends, maybe hone up on your people ski
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00165.html (12,408 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Inspections (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 09:46:45 -0500
I'll agree to this also. That's where at least for me where the wall of shame to me would be incredible. Imaging both in the magazine and on the web your station on a list of cheaters. and publish th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00212.html (11,581 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Statio inspections (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:02:57 -0500
What peer Pressure? Joe WB9SBD _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00274.html (7,941 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu