CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Inspections

To: KI9A@aol.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Inspections
From: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 09:46:45 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I'll agree to this also.

That's where at least for me where the wall of shame to me would be 
incredible.

Imaging both in the magazine and on the web  your station on a list of 
cheaters.  and publish this both after the contest, and when the 
announcement for this year is made.

"Last years cheaters were".....

Joe WB9SBD

KI9A@aol.com wrote:

>I have no problems with enforcement of the rules, but, random visits, to  
>personal property, that's crossing the line in my very humble  opinion.   I 
>would no doubt take a DQ, than to let a stranger in my  home, unannounced.  
>And, I have nothing to hide. There is NO honor, or  glory in winning by 
>cheating.  I experinced this in the past with drag  racing, and with racing 
>motocross.  I can't compete with cheaters, and it  they beat be ( known 
>cheaters), it's no big deal. I know I was clean, and I damn  near beat them.
> 
>73- Chuck KI9A
> 
> 
>In a message dated 8/15/2009 9:19:24 A.M. Central Daylight Time, Jimk8mr  
>writes:
>
>We in our no-monetary-prize environment are not alone.
> 
>In the world of tournament bridge - another no-prize-money competition -  
>last year it was deemed necessary to prohibit not only the use of, but  also 
>possession of, cell phones and the like in or near the playing  areas.  The 
>chance of an unethical competitor passing unauthorized  information to a 
>friend or teammate was considered too high.
> 
>In a recent national tournament in Washington DC, a team was penalized  for 
>a violation (probably inadvertent) of this, for which the penalty  (think 5 
>mults in radio terms) was more than their final margin of  defeat.
> 
>Stamp collectors need to be very concerned about cheating - as in fraud,  
>forgeries, etc.
> 
> 
>73  -   Jim   K8MR
> 
> 
> 
> 
>In a message dated 8/14/2009 8:14:31 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
>KI9A@aol.com writes:
>
>Random  station Inspections ..... for a hobby?
>Granted  it's a bit more than stamp  collecting, but it isn't in the
>same  class as NASCAR or Olympic class  sports with endorsements,  etc.
>Well, not to the vast majority of the   participants.
>
>
>
> 
>____________________________________
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>  
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
>Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.58/2304 - Release Date: 08/15/09 
>06:10:00
>
>  
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>