[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Inspections->Hijacked Thread

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Inspections->Hijacked Thread
From: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Reply-to: n2ic@arrl.net
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 08:54:46 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Stop it !

We had the open logs discussion ad nauseum less than a year ago !

Please, no more hijacking of threads !

Steve, N2IC

Paul O'Kane wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "David Kopacz" <david.kopacz@aspwebhosting.com>
>> It's BS. Open logs are BS.
> Really?  I believe open logs are one of the most welcome changes
> in recent years. 
>> If you want to see my logs, ask...perhaps
>> I'll let you.
> Thanks, but we don't need to ask.  When you enter CQWW your
> logs are on the web for everyone to see.
>> Think about it...if "THEY" weren't "THEMSELVES" participants
>> in the very same contest for which "THEY" intend to enforce
>> "THEIR" silly catch the cheater rules, none of this would
>> matter!
> Looks like paranoia to me.  THEY are out to get someone :-)
>> Personally, I don't think there's that much cheating going on.
> Personally, I think there is that much cheating going on, and
> I welcome station inspections and open logs.
>> Perhaps it is more likely that there are a lot of people that
>> are paranoid, delusional and can't quite figure out why they
>> are getting beat, so they conclude that everyone else must be
>> cheating. 
> Yes, that's me.  Paranoid, delusional and a poor loser :-)
>> As a "NON CHEATER", I do not advocate the use of home invasions
> Ah - the power of paranoia, to make station inspections become
> home invasions.
> 73,
> Paul EI5DI
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>