Search String: Display: Description: Sort:


References: [ 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] What to expect from 10 meters??? (score: 1)
Author: "Per Eklund" <>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 03:31:00 +0100
Might be some Auroral Es involved. Last year heard ZF2NT with Auroral 55A (Au sounding as on 2m) signals getting stronger to normal 599+ signals in sunday afternoon and worked them. After that band o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00186.html (11,550 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Conditions for 10m (score: 1)
Author: "Per Eklund" <>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:17:26 +0100
Was Aurora Es here in Northern Sweden. Probably around most of the north pole, more or less. Worked both OY:s 1377km and TF:s 1806km here on the first hop. They were very strong. Southern states came
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00258.html (9,537 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Get Rid of the Assisted Category (score: 1)
Author: "Per Eklund" <>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:04:11 +0100
My vote: Allow cluster, but do NOT allow selfspots in the DX-cluster. I think most of the contest organisers have come to the conclusion that the use of internet and packet is not controllable... And
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00465.html (12,049 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] New ham radio contesting web site (score: 1)
Author: "Per Eklund" <>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 15:28:17 +0200
Why include only NA country-specific contests in a WW toplist? Cant see any EU contests in the list, like WAE or any JA constests. CQWW would not be included either, since NA has differnt QSO points
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00105.html (10,266 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero Beating (score: 1)
Author: "Per Eklund" <>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 11:59:17 +0200
Yes, I have also noticed this. I beleive that some people prefer to listen with a higher or lower pich than the "right one". But they forget to adjust the rit (xit)to their preferring listening tone.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00008.html (9,152 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] EU HF Champinship this Saturday (score: 1)
Author: "Per Eklund" <>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:06:04 +0200
Try to hook up a rig control to the logging software between computer and radio. Then you dont have to write down frequencies. N1MM logger for instance is logging the exact frequency for each QSO. Ve
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00382.html (9,559 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesters and LOTW (score: 1)
Author: "Per Eklund" <>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 15:15:30 +0200
Another way to look at it: CFM via Lotw AND bureau request on same QSO = 48 QSO. Less than 1 %... 73 Per SM2LIY / SM2M _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00081.html (10,868 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] A Newcomers Question (score: 1)
Author: "Per Eklund" <>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:44:34 +0100
If its from your own country, it may be that the QSO is worth zero points for the other station. Then he maybe does not reply, because he have his attention to DX. If you call a European station who
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00430.html (10,177 bytes)

This search system is powered by Namazu