Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SO2R\s+vs\s+SO1R\s*$/: 52 ]

Total 52 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1)
Author: Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 10:04:18 +0000
Agreed Steve, My first SO2R setup was a FT101E to a 4 element 15M yagi and a TS820S to a tenM Yagi on the same tower - no one told me I shouldn't do it :-) Voice keyer was a cassette loop hooked up t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00129.html (11,158 bytes)

42. [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 16:57:49 -0400
All this talk about SO1R vs SO2R doesn't really matter. If the guys who do SO2R didn't do it they would still beat you because they all have a good station and good operating skills. I never really u
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00162.html (7,516 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:12:16 -0700
I have noticed, especially in the Sprints, or the NAQP contests. you can just about figure who the top 3 will be in each call area, every time. I know in the 7th call area, there are 3 stations, one
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00166.html (7,965 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1)
Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 08:30:12 -0400
Jeff, I have always contested for fun. When it is not fun I will stop. I do have to take exception with your statement "If the guys who do SO2R didn't do it they would still beat you". Too many other
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00167.html (8,706 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1)
Author: Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 20:38:10 +0000
It is never as simple as SO2R vs SO1R Until we all use the same radio and antenna there will be variations My fist SO2R setup was a FT101E and a TS820 This progressed to a pair of FT102 Yaesu's and t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00169.html (10,697 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 20:50:08 -0400
Could be said of anything. High power vs low power. Assisted vs unassisted. Stacks vs single antenna on a single tower. etc etc Ria, N2RJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00172.html (12,754 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1)
Author: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 07:08:28 +0700
Successful SO2R depends on the kindness of S&P operators who will wait for the op to get around to the person waiting or who is putting up with 'empty CQs' that are just holding frequency. S&P operat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00173.html (12,554 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 17:03:38 -0500
Successful SO2R depends on having the proficiency such that those you work don't know you're SO2R. The top ops are pretty seamless. Others are still trying. 73, kelly, ve4xt Sent from my iPhone _____
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00176.html (14,571 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1)
Author: Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 22:52:10 +0000
Spot on Kelly If anything the delays are newbies trying SO2R or the new breed of multi ops running multiple "in band" stations - experienced SO2R ops don't get involved in the hunt if they can't do i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00177.html (15,298 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1)
Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 18:33:19 -0400
One good thing for us SO1R's is when the SO2R lingers too long on the "other" band trying to log someone. That gives you a shot at a clear frequency to start calling CQ. It is not courteous to keep o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00178.html (15,534 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 20:43:46 -0400
Agree Kelly.... There's nothing worse than replying to a SO2R "run" who would rather work a few more stations on the "busier" band before responding to your call...and you know that they can hear you
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00180.html (16,073 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Shohet, KQ2M" <kq2m@kq2m.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 09:16:37 -0400
Dave, WN4AFP wrote: There's nothing worse than replying to a SO2R "run" Yes there is! When you are running and one of those loud DX M/S or M/2 stations calls you and you answer and give their report
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00183.html (18,760 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 52
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu