Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Self\s+Spotting\s*$/: 134 ]

Total 134 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: cqtestk4xs--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 20:37:46 +0000 (UTC)
Thanks to all who responded.  I don't like the idea, but to stay competivew i will do it. Send CQ-Contest mailing list submissions to     cq-contest@contesting.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00018.html (21,691 bytes)

102. [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: Chris Tate - N6WM <chris.tate@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 12:16:39 -0700
I have thought about the use of call sign prefixes from other countries to defeat others filters while self spotting and feel this is a dishonest loophole that should be closed. Crafty? No I dont thi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00045.html (7,539 bytes)

103. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 21:05:17 +0000
Pandora's box was opened when ARRL made this rule change. We are just at the beginning of the evolution (devolution?) to come. They have essentially said that anything goes. Cluster, social media, yo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00048.html (8,338 bytes)

104. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 13:10:30 -0700
Lots of hams like to think of amateur radio as a fraternity that is a cut above the population in general, but I think the facts say that we aren't any more (or less) honorable than any other segment
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00050.html (8,864 bytes)

105. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Matt Wilhelm (W1PY)" <westcoastbayou@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 17:30:21 -0400
Hi Chris, With the allowance of self-spots, what is the reason as to why it matters what call you use to spot oneself? They are not operating with that call sign on the air and what they did was not
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00056.html (10,957 bytes)

106. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 16:51:42 -0500
Randy, What problems do you anticipate? Havent seen any signs of problems yet. Did see several interviews (N6MJ and W9KKN) that were positive regarding ability to not have to stay on 160 for an inord
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00057.html (10,997 bytes)

107. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 17:10:53 -0500
A year ago, I cited and took issue with a well-known contester in New England who was self-spotting in a DX contest under a foreign call. It was disingenuous at best, as well as being unnecessary. An
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00058.html (11,145 bytes)

108. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: Chris Tate - N6WM <chris.tate@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 15:10:03 -0700
Spotting is one thing. Spotting yourself with a German prefix when you are in the continental US is bad sportsmanship and dishonest. I doesnt break any fcc rules, so the onus is on the contest manage
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00059.html (12,183 bytes)

109. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: Chris Tate - N6WM <chris.tate@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 15:20:11 -0700
Agreed _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00060.html (11,515 bytes)

110. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: Chris Tate - N6WM <chris.tate@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 15:38:49 -0700
The EU station is trying to filter for spots that come from their region, omitting spots from another continent Such as <insertWcallhere> By spotting as DL/<insertWcallhere> The eu stations will see
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00061.html (13,682 bytes)

111. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 18:06:43 -0500
Spotting yourself with another callsign, foreign or not, has nothing to do with the ARRL allowing self spotting. Its always been a problem that someone would spot themselves and try to hide it. Just
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00064.html (12,032 bytes)

112. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: Chris Tate - N6WM <chris.tate@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 16:17:46 -0700
No one is saying self spotting is wrong, but doing so honestly and not punking the system with fake calls is the right way to approach it and easily enforceable by the contest managers. _____________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00066.html (12,927 bytes)

113. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 17:24:21 -0600
Who is going to check the spots/spotters?  How exactly do you know who I am on the cluster? Anyone can use whatever call they want on nearly or all spotting networks.  There is no registration and fr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00068.html (12,813 bytes)

114. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 16:35:21 -0700
See what I mean? Dave  AB7E With the allowance of self-spots, what is the reason as to why it matters what call you use to spot oneself? They are not operating with that call sign on the air and what
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00069.html (11,340 bytes)

115. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 22:58:29 -0300
Are some of us forgetting that if you have ANY kind of a signal whatsoever, on CW (or RTTY) the Reverse Beacon Network will spot you 7 ways from Sunday nearly instantaneously? True, not all clusters
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00073.html (9,138 bytes)

116. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 16:26:35 +0000
What I found out last year is that while the ARRL decided it was okay to self spot, they never coordinated with the telnet clusters that this would be okay. So while it may be in the rules to self sp
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00077.html (9,087 bytes)

117. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:06:50 -0600
I still have not figured out who was damaged by this rule change. There is little collaboration between the spot providers.  I don't know if Lee, VE7CC is subbed to this group or not but he could det
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00078.html (10,602 bytes)

118. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: Henry Pollock - K4TMC <kilo4tmc@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 17:25:29 -0400
Mike, Re "I still have not figured out who was damaged by this rule change." As someone who operates "unassisted" and claims to be "unassisted" in my submitted logs, I feel disadvantaged against thos
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00079.html (12,257 bytes)

119. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 12:14:03 -0300
Henry or anyone confused about what self spotting does or is: Assisted (or Unlimited) has ALWAYS meant "QSO finding assistance" ie: some person or technology that tells you Romeo, P5RS7 is on 14.020
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00080.html (9,955 bytes)

120. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: Jim Neiger <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 19:42:32 -0700
Mike, I take exception that "it is virtually identical to what RBN does on CW and RTTY".  Perhaps "virtually" is your caveat that they are in fact not the same?  With RBN, or packet, etc.  the CQing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00081.html (14,185 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu