Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Your\s+Call\?\s*$/: 45 ]

Total 45 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1)
Author: Drew Vonada-Smith <drew@whisperingwoods.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:14:30 -0600
All,   Key clicks and GJ0KE were indeed annoying this contest.  But what drove me nuts, and I am surprised not to be reading it from others yet, was the "No ID while running" situation.  **It has got
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00116.html (8,329 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lott <lottsphoto@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 18:31:30 -0600
Drew, I agree 100% One way to "fix" this is Not Log the station even after you worked them and make notes to the sponsor as why select stations might be shown as a Nil in your log It would take time
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00121.html (10,145 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1)
Author: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:40:01 +0700
Sad direction of the evolution of High Speed Ops is cut number for call sign, no 5NN at all, cut numbers, and end in one dit. Why not do as I did, I got our club E2E, or EAE. 73, Charly On Tue, Feb 2
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00126.html (9,887 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1)
Author: Scott Ellington <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 21:39:36 -0600
One very well-known contester from Portugal once gave me a lengthy CW lecture when I asked for his cal, then refused to work me. I accidentally hit upon an effective strategy last weekend: If a stati
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00130.html (8,249 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 20:32:19 -0800
We do indeed. Randy, are you listening? I even started a brief discussion about this on the N1MM reflector when a guy asked for a macro to only ID after 3 QSOs. I said that this is not often enough,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00133.html (8,570 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wynn via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:41:58 +0000 (UTC)
I noticed that it seemed worse than I have ever experienced. I ran unassisted this time, as I usually do, and it drove me nuts! ChrisN4XFASEDXCGCG All,   Key clicks and GJ0KE were indeed annoying thi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00134.html (9,985 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1)
Author: Scott Ellington <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 23:12:33 -0600
On 2/22/2016 22:32, Jim Brown wrote: I said that this is not often enough, because it slows down S&P operators a lot. Call me cynical, but it's in the interest of the DX operator to slow down the S&P
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00135.html (8,864 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1)
Author: "Stephen Bloom" <sbloom@acsalaska.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 22:52:11 -0900
Ooops ..should clarify a bit ..I identify after each Q ..if there is no pileup ...the point to not iding isn't to save time sending ..it is to work the pileup down ..before reloading. 73 Steve KL7SB
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00137.html (9,984 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1)
Author: "Stephen Bloom" <sbloom@acsalaska.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 20:46:57 -0900
Hmm .I generally ID after every third Q in a heavy run .. do folks in general prefer it after each one? (Serious question). 73 Steve KL7SB because after each QSO in a big run, they skip the TU and th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00138.html (9,474 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 01:31:35 -0800
I don't think anyone would criticize you for pausing a beat to work a tailender, but if you have a decent signal, S&P stations are continuously tuning past you, we need to identify often enough that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00142.html (9,021 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1)
Author: Tom Carrubba KA2D <ka2d@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 05:28:02 -0500
Simple solution. Don't work them! I usually S&P and get decent rate going, I will not work a station who does not ID in a timely manner. Sure, it diminishes my score but it also affects theirs.. So,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00153.html (10,941 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 08:19:00 -0500
Actually we don't. In the NA Sprint, many stations send 'Dit Dit' to indicate confirmation. It's a commonly accepted practice. Ken KE3X _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mail
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00156.html (8,586 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1)
Author: "Stephen Bloom" <sbloom@acsalaska.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 06:29:47 -0900
Makes sense. It is something I always seem to be tinkering with. I'll have guys sending "?" after 2 Qs without an id ..but ..if you don't keep a predictable rythym ..you get ops who just call and cal
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00170.html (10,479 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1)
Author: Drew Vonada-Smith <drew@whisperingwoods.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:27:17 -0600
Friends,   A few more thoughts:   KL7SB - My personal opinion  is that in a perfect world, we would all ID every QSO.  But please, you are not the guy we are griping at.  You are a very good op, and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00171.html (27,413 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1)
Author: "Stephen Bloom" <sbloom@acsalaska.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 06:37:28 -0900
Eh ..every group is going to have a few idiots/troublemakers ...but for anyone who wants to compete ...or even just be a "casual regular" ...there is *zero* to be gained by pissing off another contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00172.html (10,813 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 08:38:38 -0600
Exactly, When I play in a contest or are in the middle of teaching someone new, I Use what I call my 2-2-2 rule. This applies to my pipsqueak station, a Big gun may adjust things. When CQing "Running
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00178.html (12,616 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:13:45 +0000
I listened for three.. maybe four exchanges.. no call... moved on... no problem for me.... I'll find another.. will they? Called the Hi speed guys.. got their attention.. but they couldn't copy.. and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00184.html (10,117 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:41:15 -0400
Didn't he just operate from TO7A or TO7M over the weekend? ( I forget which it was) Did I not see reports of bad clicks from this stn? Do I need to say anything more? Mike VE9AA == ...I wouldn't expe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00198.html (8,311 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:02:36 -0700
Better yet, try to work them. When they come back to you, send them the report and "call?". If they ignore you, then move on. You log nothing. They log you. They will get a NIL penalty. Good. 73, Ste
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00229.html (11,412 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1)
Author: Scott Ellington <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:19:34 -0600
On 2/24/2016 12:02, Steve London wrote: Better yet, try to work them. When they come back to you, send them the report and "call?". That is precisely what prompted the lengthy CW lecture from the fam
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00235.html (9,376 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu