>Peter Chadwick wrote:
>>
>>Just to add to the debate, I haven't seen anyone come up with a boiling
>>point temperature for gold in a vacuum - if it's lower than at
>>atmospheric pressure, then the arguments about grid temperature take on
>>a new dimension.
>>
I mentioned this during the parasitics debate.
>
>The normal definition of "boiling point" is the temperature at which the
>vapor pressure of the liquid or solid equals the surrounding pressure -
>which is rather meaningless under high-vacuum conditions.
>
>What matters is the absolute vapour pressure of the gold - or any other
>contaminant of a totally "clean" vacuum - and its effect on the
>performance of the tube.
>
The vacuum in power grid tubes is high.
>I used to know enough physical chemistry to be able to estimate vapour
>pressure as a function of temperature, starting out from other data
>about the material, but I'm not sure that the approximations would hold
>up under vacuum conditions.
According to one chem. data book, the boiling point of gold is 2966
degrees C, at a pressure of one atmosphere. In a high vacuum it says
that slow evaporation is possible at lower temperatures, however, it says
nothing about the boiling point in a high vacuum.
>
>One thing I do remember from high-vacuum work is that our normal "feel"
>for how much power it takes to heat up an object like a resistor is WAY
>off when the object is in a vacuum. When there is no air to provide
>convective cooling, temperatures shoot up very quickly.
True, although the additional power needed to raise an object in a
black-chamber-vacuum to a specific temperature is a function of T^4. In
1986, an Eimac engineer said that gold-sputtering was due to an
oscillation condition.
>
>I could quite believe that in a vacuum tube, only a few seconds of
>"normal" overdrive (as opposed to a huge transient) might to heat up the
>grid to a temperature high enough to mobilize the gold.
Perhaps, if you saw a gold-sputtered 8877 grid assembly through a low
power microscope, you might see things a bit differently, Ian. The
event that causes the damage apparently happens suddenly.
- IMO, overdrive tends to dislodge patches of cathode coating, without
damaging the gold plating on the grid. {photograph in September 1990
article "Parasitics Revisited".}
cheers
Rich.....
R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|